MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912103480 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3793317

Meligethes viridescens

2008· article· en· W6912103480 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
Canadian institutionsCanadian Forest ServiceNatural Resources CanadaNova Scotia Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCline (biology)Nova scotiaLarvaZoogeographyTaxonomy (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Meligethes viridescens (Fabricius, 1797) Charlotte Co.: near Maces Bay, 45.1245°N, 66.4735°W, 12.VIII.2007, R.P. Webster, Barrier (sea) beach, sweeping vegetation, (14, NBM, RWC). Majka and Cline (2006) documented the introduction history of this species in North America. The species has previously been reported from Maine, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, and Québec (Hoebeke and Wheeler 1996; Mason et al. 2003), and is found throughout most of Europe, western North Africa, Turkey, the northern Middle East, the Caucasus, and northern Iran east to western Kazakhstan. Larvae feed on many genera of Brassicaceae, particularly Brassica spp., Sinapis spp., Cardamine spp., Arabis spp., and Erucastrum spp. (Kirk-Spriggs 1996, Majka and Cline 2006). In Europe, it is a widespread and common pest of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L. and Brassica rapa L.) (Mason et al. 2003). In Nova Scotia it has frequently been found on wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum L., Brassicaceae) (Majka and Cline 2006) and R.P. Webster swept specimens from nettles (Urtica sp., Urticaceae) in Maine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicLepidoptera: Biology and TaxonomyFrench-language works237,207