Bibliographic record
Abstract
Romualdius scaber (Linnaeus) Curculio scaber Linnaeus, 1758 Trachyphloeus bifoveolatus (Beck, 1817) Records. ČER ČNG IFR KHM KHR KYI LWI POL RIV TER VIN VOL ZAK ŽIT [Cherkunov 1889: 193; Mazur 2002: 241; Nazarenko & Kravchenko 2002: 36; Sheshurak & Nazarenko 2002: 122; Yunakov 2003c: 337; Nazarenko 2010d: 90]. Distribution. Europe, Kazakhstan, West Siberia; introduced to USA and Canada (Bright & Bouchard, 2007). Material examined. Kharkiv Prov.: 2 f (KUMN) Izyum, slope of Kremyanets Mt., A.N. Drogvalenko leg., 04.v.2004; 1 f (KUMN) 13 km SSE of Kharkiv, Vasishcheve, Urochyshche Chorny Lis, A.N. Drogvalenko leg., 23.v.2002; Lviv Prov.: 1 f (KUMN) Stryj, left bank of Stryj River, N. Kalashnik leg., 11.vii.1967; Poltava Prov.: 1 f (KUMN) 16 km NW Mirhorod, 1 km NE Romadan, Vodyanitskaya T.B. leg., 12.viii.1997; Rivne Prov.: 1 f (SIZK) Rivne Nature Reserve, V. Yu. Nazarenko leg., 18.vi.2008; Vinnytsia Prov.: 1 spec. (SIZK) Gnivan, 21.vi.1935; 7 f (KUMN) 18 km N Vinnytsia, Salnyk env., Trapeznikova leg., 05.viii.1997; 1 f (KUMN) SW Gaisyna, Ladyzhenske Forestry, Lopatyne locality, Korotkova leg., 15.vi.1967; Zakarpatska Prov.: 1 f (KUMN) ca. 23 km NE Hust, Zabrid, Stolar S. leg., 14.vii.1997; 1 f (KUMN) 15 km SE of Mizhhiria, Mereshor env., Yunakovleg., 09.vii.1997; Zhytomyr Prov.: 9 f (KUMN) Novograd-Volynsky env., Mikhailov leg., 12.v.1911; 1 spec. (SIZK) Zhytomyr, Proschiga leg., 10.v.1921; 2 spec. (SIZK) idem, 21.vii.1921. Biology. Grasslands, meadows in forests. Parthenogenetic; Adults occur in IV–VIII. Polyphagous, in grass litter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".