Bibliographic record
Abstract
29. Coleophoridae – coleophorid moths Minute to small (8–15 mm wingspan), narrow-winged moths. Most adults have lightcolored or metallic green wings (Coleophorinae), black and white patterned wings (Momphinae), or gray and black wings (Blastobasinae). Th ey are similar superficially to the Gracillariidae and Batrachedridae. Larvae have diverse feedings habits; many are casebearers and feed on leaves, flowers, and seeds (Coleophorinae); others feed on various plant parts or are scavengers. A few are opportunistic predators. The family Coleophoridae includes several lineages that were recently considered to be separate families. Th e subfamily Coleophorinae comprises over 1000 described species, primarily in the genus Coleophora. Th e subfamily Momphinae comprises 60 described species, primarily in the genus Mompha. Th e subfamily Blastobasinae comprises 300 described species. All three of these subfamilies are particularly diverse in the Nearctic region, and all are in need of revision. Many new species remain to be described, particularly in the subfamily Coleophorinae. Hodges (1999a) reported that only 20%–25% of Nearctic species had been described. A fourth subfamily, the Pterolonchinae, comprises eight species, all from the Old World; one has been introduced to North America as a biological control agent of knapweed (Centaurea spp.; Compositae). Two hundred and sixty-seven species of Coleophoridae are known in North America; 39 species are reported in AB. Few AB specimens have been examined in detail by experts, so the fauna is poorly known. Few recent taxonomic works exist for the Coleophoridae. Landry and Wright (1993) revised the metallic green Coleophora; McDunnough (1958) and J.-F. Landry (1998a) provided many excellent illustrations of several Coleophora species. Adamski and Brown (1989) provided a higher-level systematic treatment of the Blastobasinae, and Adamski and Hodges (1996) published a nomenclature review and a checklist for the North American Blastobasinae.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.055 | 0.027 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".