Bibliographic record
Abstract
181 Euura sagmarius (Konow, 1895) Figs 199, 427 Amauronematus sagmarius Konow, 1895: 177–178. Lectotype designated by Muche (1975). Amauronematus viduatinus Malaise, 1931b: 40–41. Lectotype designated below. Syn. nov. Amauronematus viduatinus var. apiciscerra Malaise, 1931b: 41. Lectotype designated below. Syn. nov. Diagnosis The palest females have a nearly completely reddish head and thorax (except antenna), while the abdomen is still dorsally mostly black, separating them from E. miltonota (mostly yellowish, including the abdomen dorsally). The darkest specimens might not be reliably distinguishable from E. nimbus if the mesepisternum becomes completely black (usually at least slightly brownish or reddish). Males might not be clearly distinguishable from E. nimbus. Female ZMUO.064651 with almost completely black mesepisternum (slightly brown line in the middle), labrum, clypeus and malar space pale, head behind and above eyes slightly brownish, abdomen ventroapically mostly pale. Type material examined Lectotype Amauronematus sagmarius RUSSIA – Volgograd oblast • ♀; Sarepta [Volgograd]; 48.69° N, 44.53° E; SDEI, GBIF-GISHym4100. Lectotype Amauronematus viduatinus, here designated RUSSIA – Kamchatka oblast • ♀; Nischne-Kamtchatsk, Lake Azhabachye; 56.166° N, 161.893° E; R. Malaise leg.; NHRS, NHRS-HEVA000006398. Paralectotype Amauronematus viduatinus RUSSIA – Kamchatka oblast • 1 ♀; same data as for lectotype; NHRS, NHRS-HEVA000006394. Lectotype Amauronematus viduatinus var. apiciscerra, here designated RUSSIA – Kamchatka oblast • ♀; Klutchi [Klyuchi]; 56.32° N, 160.85° E; R. Malaise leg.; NHRS, NHRS-HEVA000006404. Host plants Salix phylicifolia and possibly some other Salix spp. Genetics COI Based on 21 specimens, maximum within-species distance is 2.74% and the nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 0%, is Euura nimbus. Nuclear Based on 20 specimens, maximum within-species distance is 1.34% (0.88% based on haplotypes of individual females). The nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 0.45%, is Euura nimbus. Distribution and material examined Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland, Norway, Russia, and Sweden.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".