MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6912222225 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.16876178

Nemoura arctica Esben-Petersen 1910

2025· article· en· W6912222225 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFoothillsHolarcticRange (aeronautics)ArcticVoltinismBoreal

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nemoura arctica Esben-Petersen, 1910 Notes This species is commonly referred to as the Arctic Forestfly (Stark et al. 2012). Grubbs et al. (2018) provided evidence with scanning electron microscopy that N. arctica is a circumpolar, northern Holarctic species. This species was previously recognized as N. trispinosa Claassen, 1923 in eastern North America. The North American range of this species is extensive, reported from Alaska, east across all Canadian provinces, and in the USA from Wyoming east across the Laurentian Great Lakes region to New England states (Grubbs et al. 2018, DeWalt et al. 2024). Harper (1973 a) found that larvae of N. arctica (as N. trispinosa) displayed a slow univoltine life cycle in a southern Ontario stream, with peak emergence occurring in mid-June. New York records are available from Level IV Ecoregions Eastern Adirondack Foothills (58 ac), Central Adirondacks (58 ad), Adirondack High Peaks (58 z), Finger Lakes Uplands and Gorges (60 d), and Champlain Lowlands (83 b) (Fig. 17 e). Adult collection dates range from early April to early August (Fig. 18). Reported elevations for this species in the state range from 119-469 m asl (Fig. 19).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology→French-language works237,207→