Liebstadia (Liebstadia) longior
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Liebstadia (Liebstadia) longior (Berlese, 1908) Morphological features (Figure 5a–h). Body length: 434 (420–440) μm, body width: 237 (225–245) μm (n = 10). Body small and very flat; prolamella well developed; sensillus with short stalk and globular head; pteromorphs short and subtriangular; notogaster with 10 pairs of setae and three pairs of porose areas; epimeral setal formula: 3-1-3-3; genito-anal formula: 4-1-2-3; tarsus III with 15 setae; genu I with 3+1 setae; legs with one claw. Material examined. Turkey, Yozgat, the Karanlıkdere valley; 39°34’579’’ N, 34°40’200’’ E, 847 m, 17.VIII.2013, 4 inds, from moss on tree; 39°32’273’’ N, 34°43’185’’ E, 921 m; 24.VIII.2013, 2 inds., 39° 32’273’’ N, 34°43’271’’ E, 925 m, 24.VIII.2013, 5 inds., 39°34’762’’ N, 34°38’ 902’’ E, 844 m, 14.IX.2013, 13 inds., 39° 33’157’’ N, 34°42’201’’ E, 883 m, 28.IX.2013. 2 inds., 39°35’768’’ N, 34°32’088’’ E, 790 m, 01.V.2014, 3 inds., 39°32’533’’ N, 34°42’705’’ E, 882 m, 06.VI.2014, 2 inds. from moss on rock; 39°34’813’’ N, 34°35’674’’ E, 808 m, 14.IX.2013, 3 inds.,39° 34’813’’ N, 34°35’674’’ E, 808 m, 14.IX.2013, 4 inds. (2 of them were used for SEM), 39°34’813’’ N, 34°35’678’’ E, 815 m, 28.IX.2013, 3 inds. from soil edge the swamp; 39°30’766’’ N, 34°44’190’’ E, 913 m, 23.V.2014, 4 inds., 39°30’794’’ N, 34°44’113’’ E, 913 m, 23.V.2014, 2 inds., 39°30’824’’ N, 34°44’002’’ E, 916 m, 23.V.2014, 7 inds., 39°33’189’’ N, 34°41’668’’ E, 873 m, 17.VIII.2013, 3 inds. from moss. Distribution. Liebstadia (L.) longior (Berlese, 1908) is distributed in Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Greece, Macedonia, Poland, Romania, Slovenia, Japan, and Canada (Subías, 2004, updated 2020; Miko and Weigmann,1996; Mahunka et al., 2013). This is the first record from Turkey. Remarks. Liebstadia (L.) longior (Berlese, 1908) can be distinguished from congeners by the presence of small and very flat body; short, globular sensillus; short and subtriangular pteromorphs; tarsus III with 15 setae; genu I with 3+1 setae. The body length for the species is recorded as 325–395 µm by Miko and Weigmann (1996). In this regard, the dimensions of the Turkish specimens (420–440 µm) are bigger than reported.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".