Dolichogenidea robmacewani Fernandez-Triana & Boudreault 2025, sp. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dolichogenidea robmacewani Fernandez-Triana & Boudreault sp. nov. Fig. 119 A – F Type material. Holotype. Brazil • Female, CNC; Bahia, Encruzilhada; 880 m; xi.1974; M. Alvarenga leg.; Voucher code: CNC 1196549. Paratypes. Brazil • 5 Females, CNC; CNC 5342690, CNC 5342691, CNC 5342692, CNC 5342693, CNC 5342694. Diagnostic description. T 1 more or less parallel-sided and mostly sculptured with longitudinal striae on posterior 0.5–0.6 (but sometimes with central smooth area near posterior margin); T 2 more or less transverse and entirely smooth; ovipositor sheath clearly longer than metatibia length (≥ 1.25 ×, usually more); labial palpi, tegula and humeral complex yellow; first two pairs of legs entirely yellow (except for coxae brown); third pair of legs mostly brown to dark brown (except for yellow trochanter and trochantellus, anterior 0.7 of metatibia yellow and metatibial spurs yellow-white); body length: 2.44–3.06 mm; fore wing length: 2.84–3.38 mm. Among species with sculptured T 1 but smooth and transverse T 2, and all coxae dark colored, D. robmacewani can be distinguished by its mostly yellow legs (except third pair), yellow tegula, humeral complex and palpi, and relatively long ovipositor sheaths. Distribution. Brazil (BA, MG). Biology. No host data available. DNA barcoding data. No data. Etymology. The second author dedicates this species in honor of her friend Rob MacEwan. Rob’s knowledge of nature and kindness are both extraordinary! His friendship is greatly appreciated. Notes. Among the paratypes there is some variation on sculpture of T 1 and color of metafemur and metatibia, but they are all kept as one species until more material becomes available for study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".