MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912265013 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4449985

Nuntianus Miranda & Skevington & Marshall 2020, gen. nov.

2020· article· en· W6912265013 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFish Biology and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDorsumSetaGenusScutellumWhite (mutation)Head (geology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Genus Nuntianus Miranda gen. nov. Figs 23–47, 75, 86–87, 96–97 rn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: BDB84EA7-970F-439A-AF85-E5E0B2AE9BC7 Type species: Baccha lepida Macquart, 1842 Baccha lepidus species group, in part. Hull (1949a) Ocyptamus lepidus species group. Thompson (1981); Miranda et al. (2016); Mengual et al. (2018) Description. Head. Face very narrow to narrow (between 1/4 and less than a 1/3 of head width) and usually pale; tubercle usually weak and medially positioned, slightly concave dorsally and ventrally (Fig. 87). Antennal insertions confluent. Frons very narrow (~1/4 of head width) to normal (~ 1/3 of head width), white microtrichia usually homogeneously distributed but sparse on a median longitudinal area and absent dorsal to lunule. Female ocellar triangle adjacent to or ~1 ocellus-width from lateral eye margin (Fig. 86). Vertex either homogeneously covered by dull white microtrichia, or with sparse white microtrichia, or without microtrichia and shiny. Dorsal occiput with one row of pile (Figs 86, 87). Thorax. Scutum usually pale laterally from postpronotum to post-alar callus, and usually without distinct anterior row of pile (Figs 23–37). Scutellum usually entirely pale. Anterior anepisternum pilose (except bare on N. croceus and the species group N. hyalipennis). Katatergite usually with short microtrichia that gives the sclerite a ‘velvet’ appearance. Metaepisternum pilose or bare. Metasternum bare. Upper calypter margin bare or with pile shorter than pile on the ventral calypter margin. Metafemur with normal pile. Wing. Alula usually narrow (as wide as c cell). Wing either hyaline or entirely light yellow to light brown. Vein M1 sometimes straight (Fig. 44). Abdomen. Abdomen and terga colour pattern variable. Terminalia. Female tergum 7 only *lightly sclerotized (Fig. 47, except in the N. hyalipennis species group); tergum 8 variable. Male surstylus usually with homogeneously distributed setulae or setae; *subepandrial sclerite ‘crescent’ shaped (Figs 45 and 46) and usually with pair of apical projecting lobes between bases of surstyli; hypandrium usually oval and quite robust apically, with ventral pilosity sub-apically or apically; postgonite with sub-apical acute dorsal extremity and with either a rounded or acute ventral extremity; basiphallus teardropshaped, distiphallus membranous with dorsal sclerotized triangular region (Figs 92, 96, 97). Included species (63): N. abata (Curran, 1938) comb. nov. [2, 4, type lost], N. aeolus (Hull, 1943a) comb. nov. [1b], N. anona (Hull, 1943e) comb. nov. [1b], N. arabella (Hull, 1947a) comb. nov. [2], N. banksi (Hull, 1941a) comb. nov. [1b], N. cecrops (Hull, 1958) comb. nov. [1a], N. chapadensis (Curran, 1930a) comb. nov. [1b], N. confusus (Goot, 1964) comb. nov. [4, type lost], N. crocatus (Austen, 1893) comb. nov. [1b], N. croceus (Austen, 1893) comb. nov. [2], N. cubanus (Hull, 1943a) comb. nov. [1b], N. cultratus (Austen, 1893) comb. nov. [1a (synonym, Baccha currani Hull), 2, 3, 4], N. cymbellina (Hull, 1944) comb. nov. [1b], N. debasa (Curran, 1941) comb. nov. [1b], N. delicatissimus (Hull, 1943b) comb. nov. [1b], N. dryope (Hull, 1958) comb. nov. [1a], N. fervidus (Austen, 1893) comb. nov. [2], N. filii (Doesburg, 1966) comb. nov. [1b, 4], N. flavens (Austen, 1893) comb. nov. [1b], N. geijskesi (Doesburg, 1966) comb. nov. [1b, 4], N. gilvus (Austen, 1893) comb. nov. [2], N. halcyone (Hull, 1949b) comb. nov. [1a], N. hippolite (Hull, 1957) comb. nov. [1a], N. hyalipennis (Curran, 1930b) comb. nov. [1b], N. inornatus (Walker, 1836) comb. nov. [1b], N. io (Hull, 1944) comb. nov. [1b], N. iona (Curran, 1941) comb. nov. [1b], N. lepidus (Macquart, 1842) comb. nov. [1b, 4], N. lucretia (Hull, 1949c) comb. nov. [1a], N. luctuosus (Bigot, 1884) comb. nov. [1a (synonym, Baccha papilio Hull), 4, type lost], N. micropyga (Curran, 1941) comb. nov. [1b], N. minimus (Hull, 1943b) comb. nov. [1b], N. murinus (Curran, 1930a) comb. nov. [1b], N. myiophagus (Thompson in Mengual et al., 2018) comb. nov. [1a], N. neoparvicornis (Telford, 1973) comb. nov. [2, 4], N. neptunus (Hull, 1943d) comb. nov. [1b], N. neuralis (Curran, 1934) comb. nov. [1b], N. niobe (Hull, 1943c) comb. nov. [1b], N. nora (Curran, 1941) comb. nov. [1b], N. obliquus (Curran, 1941) comb. nov. [1b], N. octomaculatus (Thompson in Thompson et al., 1976) comb. nov. [1a], N. oriel (Hull, 1942a) comb. nov. [1b], N. panamensis (Curran, 1930c) comb. nov. [1b], N. peri (Hull, 1943a) comb. nov. [1b], N. philippianus (Enderlein, 1938) comb. nov. [2, type lost?], N. prenes (Curran, 1930a) comb. nov. [1b], N. prudens (Curran, 1934) comb. nov. [1b], N. pullus (Sack, 1921) comb. nov. [1a (synonym, Baccha sepia Hull), 1b (synonym, Baccha danaida Hull and Baccha violacea Hull)], N. punctifrons (Williston, 1891) comb. nov. [1b], N. pyxia (Hull, 1943a) comb. nov. [1b], N. saffrona (Hull, 1943c) comb. nov. [1b], N. spatulatus (Giglio-Tos, 1892) comb. nov. [2], N. vanessa (Hull, 1949a) comb. nov. [1a], N. variegatus (Macquart, 1842) comb. nov. [1b], N. verona (Curran, 1941) comb. nov. [1b], N. victoria (Hull, 1941b) comb. nov. [1a], N. vierecki (Curran, 1930a) comb. nov. [1b], N. xanthopterus (Wiedemann, 1830) comb. nov. [2], N. xantippe (Hull, 1949a) comb. nov. [1a], N. zenillia (Curran, 1941) comb. nov. [1b], N. zita (Curran, 1941) comb. nov. [1b], N. zobeide (Hull, 1943e) comb. nov. [1b], N. zoroaster (Hull, 1943a) comb. nov. [1b]. Etymology. The name is a reference to the Latin word for ‘messenger’ or ‘message’ since there are still more information/messages to be discovered inside the genus. The name is to be treated as masculine. Comments. This is the former Ocyptamus lepidus species group. Most common species can be recognized by the abdominal pattern of dark apical extensions (one medial and a sub-lateral pair) into a mostly pale background (Figs 23 and 43); this pattern is what earlier authors called the yellow ‘inverted V-shaped’ markings (Figs 30 and 32). Other species have abdominal patterns that seem to be variations of the common one (Figs 24, 27, 28, 33, 34 and 42). Species of Nuntianus can be readily distinguished from the superficially similar Hybobathus Enderlein, 1938 by the absence of the contrasting ocellar triangle present in the latter (see Fig. 78 in Mengual et al. 2018). Besides the abdominal pattern, the genus can also be quickly separated from other taxa by the often entirely light yellow to brown wings. Despite the variability in superficial color characters, the monophyly of Nuntianus is strongly supported in the combined molecular analysis of Miranda et al. (2016). One of the possible unique synapomorphies, so far not present in any other lineage, for the genus lies on the condition of the female tergum 7: most closely related lineages have a distinct tergum 7, but in Nuntianus it is almost wholly membranous with weakly sclerotized basal areas (Fig. 47). Larval predatory habits seem quite diverse in this genus. Besides the predation of aphids as seen in N. cubanus (but see below) (Mengual et al. 2018), there are records of N. luctuosus as aquatic predators in bromeliads (Rotheray et al. 2000) and records of N. myiophagus as a predator of adult insects (Ureña & Hanson 2010). Nuntianus variegatus (Fig. 75) was previously allocated in the Ocyptamus melanorrhinus species group (Mengual et al. 2018), but type images indicate that it belongs to Nuntianus due to its similarity to N. zita. Nuntianus is the largest of the taxa recently removed from the old ‘ Ocyptamus’ assemblage, and includes subgroups yet to be properly defined. One such group is the N. hyalipennis species group (N. hyalipennis, N. neuralis, N. obliquus and N. panamensis), once thought to be related to Calostigma Shannon, 1927 (Thompson 1981) but strongly supported as part of Nuntianus by molecular characters (Miranda et al. 2016). These small flies differ from most congeners in having a straight, or nearly so, vein M1 [see comments in Miranda et al. (2016: 172)]; the N. hyalipennis species group can be further distinguished from Calostigma by the scutum with 3 long and white microtrichose stripes (the lateral pair wider than the median stripe) (similar to Fig. 27), yellow scutellum (Fig. 43), brownish yellow and almost completely microtrichose wings, and the abdominal terga mainly pale and with apical dark stripes (Fig. 43). Other possible subgroups of Nuntianus comprise the species with wide parallel-sided (Fig. 23) to oval (Fig. 25) abdomens (N. cultratus, N. fervidus, N. geijskesi, N. gilvus, N. iona, N. lepidus, N. luctuosus, N. myiophagus, N. neoparvicornis, N. neptunus, N. peri, N. pullus, and N. prudens), species with petiolate (Fig. 30) abdomens (N. abata, N. aeolus, N. anona, N. arabella, N. banksi, N. cecrops, N. chapadensis, N. crocatus, N. croceus, N. cubanus, N. debasa, N. filii, N. flavens, N. halcyone, N. hippolite, N. io, N. lucretia, N. murinus, N. niobe, N.octomaculatus, N.oriel, N. prenes, N. punctifrons, N. pyxia, N. saffrona, N. spatulatus, N. vanessa, N. variegatus, N. verona, N. victoria, N. vierecki, N. zita, and N. zobeide), and species with relatively slender (Fig. 37), rather than petiolate, abdomens (N. confusus, N. cymbellina, N. delicatissimus, N. dryope, N. micropyga, N. minimus, N. nora, N. zenillia, and N. zoroaster). A few species are of uncertain grouping due to insufficient information on the shape of the abdomen, because the literature is inadequate, the type is not available for examination, or type is greatly damaged (N. inornatus, N. philippianus, N. xantippe, and N. xanthopterus). Nuntianus lepidus was chosen as the type species for the genus based on the long history of the ‘ lepidus species group’. Nuntianus cubanus (Fig. 41), the only Nuntianus species that occurs in the Nearctic region (Florida, USA), seems to be distinct from the rest of the genus.A neighbour-joining analysis using the COI gene (analysis not shown here) places specimens of this species in a separate cluster far fr

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicFish Biology and Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207