Bibliographic record
Abstract
A revised key to the species of Stalaria 1. Second and third antennal segments with erect setae which are longer than width of segment; rostrum and femora with longish, erect setae; total length over 6.0mm (Fig. 1)................................................. kisseis (Linnavuori) - Second and third antennal segments without erect setae which are longer than width of segment; total length less than 6.0mm ................................................................................................... 2 2. Pronotum and scutellum with numerous long, erect setae; total length usually over 5.2mm (Fig. 4)... noctuabunda (Bergroth) - Pronotum and scutellum without numerous long, erect setae; total length usually less than 5.2mm ..................... 3 3. Apex of corium with a conspicuous black macula (Fig. 2); scutellum with elongate, yellowish lateral stripe on each side of midline and without a median dark brown triangular area; fourth antennal segment dark brown with a distinct yellow subapical annulus; male total length over 4.75mm ................................................. lestoni Slater and Zheng - Apex of corium without a conspicuous and well-developed black macula (Fig. 3); scutellum with a median dark brown trian- gular area; fourth antennal segment brown without a distinct yellow subapical annulus; male total length under 4.75mm ....................................................................................... nana Slater and Zheng
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.025 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".