MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912303710 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4337957

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) meteorum Gardner & Gibbs 2020, sp. nov.

2020· article· en· W6912303710 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBryophyte Studies and Records
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecorumAedeagusAnterior surfaceHead (geology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) meteorum sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: FD56C6BC-5A3F-436B-B3F2-A3DD6B50C9F1 Figs 58–60, 90H, 94B, 105B Diagnosis Females of Lasioglossum meteorum sp. nov. can be recognized by the head and mesosoma with very strong microsculpture, scutum with sparse punctures (i=1–4 pd) becoming abruptly denser laterad of the parapsidal lines (i=1–2 pd), frons with fine and dense but distinctly separated punctures, pronotal angle nearly 90 degrees, T1 anterior surface weakly coriarious, acarinarial fan weakly developed, and metasoma with very sparse or absent tomentum. They are most similar to L. tessellatosum sp. nov., L. decorum sp. nov., and L. austerum sp. nov. Females of L. tessellatosum sp. nov. have the frons with crowded and indistinct punctures, scutum with even stronger microsculpture obscuring the punctures, and T1 anterior surface shiny. Females of L. decorum sp. nov. have the scutum shinier with more uniformly sparse punctures (i=1–3 pd), acarinarial fan dense, and metasomal terga with more extensive tomentum. Females of L. austerum sp. nov. have the scutum more densely punctate in part (i= 1–3 pd), mesosoma with weaker microsculpture, and pronotal angle obtuse. Males of L. meteorum sp. nov. can be recognized by the clypeus, supraclypeal area, and mesepisternum sparsely punctate (i= 1–4 pd), scutum very sparsely punctate and weakly tessellate (i =1–6 pd), metasomal terga with broad impunctate rims, and clypeus lacking a non-metallic apical band. They are most similar to L. tessellatosum sp. nov. Males of L. tessellatosum sp. nov. have the clypeus and mesepisternum densely punctate (i ≤ 1 pd), scutum with strong dull microsculpture, and clypeus with a very narrow non-metallic black apical band. Etymology The specific epithet meteorum is formed from the Latinized Greek adjective ‘ meteoros ’ (‘lifted up’, ‘in air’). It refers to the fiery red colouration of the metasoma and this species’ proximity to the Chicxulub meteor impact crater. An appropriate translation would be the meteor sweat bee. Material examined Holotype MEXICO – Yucatan • ♀; Merida, 15 km S of University of Yucatan; [20.83° N, 89.62° W]; 7 Apr. 1997; R. Brooks leg.; ex Piscidia piscipula; SEMC. [Verbatim label: MEXICO: Yucatan / Merida, 15 km S / University of Yucatan / 7 APR 1997; R.Brooks / MEX 1B 01 / ex: Piscidia piscipula // SM0105926 / KUNHM-ENT // HOLOTYPE / Lasioglossum (Dialictus) meteorum Gardner and Gibbs] Paratypes MEXICO – Quintana Roo • 8 ♀♀, 6 ♂♂; Felipe Carrillo Puerto; 19.35° N, 88.03° W; 13 Oct. 1986; T.L. Griswold and F.D. Parker leg.; ex Mentha sp.; BBSL • 5 ♀♀; same location as for preceding; 10–14 Oct. 1986; BBSL • 1 ♀; 25 km W of Felipe Carrillo Puerto; 19.35° N, 88.17° W; 15 Oct. 1986; T.L. Griswold leg.; BBSL. – Yucatan • 1 ♀; Baxac, 20 km SW of Tzucacab; [19.94° N, 89.18° W]; 12 Feb. 1987; C. Michener leg.; ex Viguiera dentata; SEMC. Description Female COLOURATION. Head and mesosoma blue-green to golden-green; clypeus apical colour black, reddish brown, or orange; labrum reddish brown to orange; mandible orange with black basal spot or band and red tip; flagellum black to dark reddish brown dorsally, slightly lighter ventrally; pronotal lobe reddish brown to orange; metasoma orange to reddish brown with dark spiracular spots on T3–4 and sometimes T2; legs reddish brown with femur-tibia joints, tarsi, and sometimes tibiae mostly orange; tegula orange; wing membrane infuscated, veins brown to dark brown. PUBESCENCE. Body hair colour golden to white. Tomentum dense on pronotal angle and lobe and space between pronotal lobe and tegula; sparse on paraocular area, gena, metepisternum, T2–3 basolaterally, and T4 throughout. Scutum hair thin. Wing hairs dark, long and dense. Acarinarial fan incomplete, sparse. T2 fringes sparse, T3 fringes sparse. SURFACE SCULPTURE. Clypeus punctures sparse (i =1–4 pd), sculpture shiny in apical half or more, tessellate basally; supraclypeal area punctures sparse (i =1–4 pd), sculpture tessellate, sometimes shiny medially; paraocular area punctures dense (i ≤ 1 pd), sculpture shiny ventrally and in narrow line adjacent to compound eye, otherwise tessellate; frons punctures crowded (i=0 pd), sometimes indistinct above antenna, sculpture imbricate, sometimes becoming weakly rugulose above antenna; vertex punctures fine, dense to moderately dense laterally (i ≤ 2 pd), sparse medially (i= 1–3 pd), often obscure, sculpture imbricate, sometimes shiny medially; gena punctures fine, sparse (i=1–3 pd), sculpture shiny, becoming tessellate and sometimes ruguloso-lineate posteriorly and ventrally; postgena sculpture tessellate and sometimes ruguloso-lineate; tegula punctures absent; scutum punctures sparse (i=1–4 pd), abruptly becoming moderately dense laterad of parapsidal line (i=1–2 pd), sculpture tessellate to finely reticulate; scutellum punctures sparse (i=1–5 pd), sculpture tessellate to finely reticulate; metanotum sculpture tessellate and finely rugulose; metapostnotum rugae strong, anastomosing, not reaching margin, sculpture tessellate to finely reticulate; preëpisternum sculpture finely reticulate and densely but obscurely punctate (i ≤ 1 pd) or rugulose; hypoepimeron punctures dense (i <1 pd), obscure, sculpture finely reticulate; mesepisternum punctures moderately dense (i =1–2 pd), sculpture finely reticulate; metepisternum sculpture lineate dorsally, ruguloso-punctate ventrally; propodeum lateral face sculpture tessellate; propodeum posterior face sculpture tessellate; T1 anterior face sculpture weakly coriarious; T1 dorsal surface punctures fine, sparse (i=2–4 pd), absent in large apicolateral oval patches, rim medially, and sometimes median line, sculpture shiny; T2 disc punctures fine, sparse (i =2–4 pd), disc sculpture shiny to weakly coriarious, rim punctures absent, rim sculpture coriarious. STRUCTURE. Face length/width ratio 0.82 (± 0.03 SD). Clypeus projecting ~50% below suborbital tangent; clypeal area length/width ratio 0.47 (± 0.02 SD); apicolateral denticles rounded knobs; supraclypeal area length/width ratio 0.66 (± 0.05 SD). Forewing with 3 submarginal cells; pronotal angle slightly obtuse, nearly right-angled; tegula shape normal. Intertegular distance 0.88 (± 0.07 SD) mm. Scutum length/ width ratio 0.77 (± 0.02 SD); scutum/scutellum length ratio 3.14 (± 0.24 SD); scutellum/metanotum length ratio 1.5 (± 0.11 SD); metanotum/metapostnotum length ratio 0.7 (± 0.06 SD). Propodeum lateral carinae not reaching dorsal margin; oblique carina absent. T2 depressed apical rim length less than 50% of segment. (n =10) Male COLOURATION. Head and mesosoma blue-green to golden-green; clypeus apical colour concolourous with base; labrum black to reddish brown; mandible orange with black basal band and red tip; flagellum black to reddish brown dorsally, orange to brown ventrally; pronotal lobe reddish brown; metasoma black to reddish brown; legs black to reddish brown with femur-tibia joints, base and apex of tibiae, and tarsi orange to brown; tegula orange to brown; wing membrane hyaline to infuscated, veins brown to dark brown. PUBESCENCE. Body hair colour pale yellow to white. Tomentum dense on paraocular area, lower half of frons, and pronotal angle and lobe; sparse on clypeus, supraclypeal area, and gena. Scutum hair thin to moderately plumose. Sterna hair moderately long (1–2 OD), densely plumose, sparse and erect. Wing hairs dark, short and dense. SURFACE SCULPTURE. Clypeus punctures sparse (i= 1–4 pd), sculpture shiny; supraclypeal area punctures sparse (i=1–4 pd), sculpture shiny to tessellate; paraocular area punctures moderately dense (i=1–2 pd), sculpture shiny; frons punctures crowded (i =0 pd), becoming shallow and indistinct above antenna, sculpture reticulate-rugulose, becoming shiny to imbricate laterally; vertex punctures dense laterally (i ≤ 1 pd), sparse medially (i= 1–3 pd), sculpture imbricate, sometimes shiny medially; gena punctures sparse (i =1–3 pd), sculpture shiny, sometimes becoming weakly imbricate and weakly lineate posteriorly and ventrally; postgena sculpture shiny, becoming weakly imbricate and weakly lineate posteriorly and laterad of hypostomal carina; tegula punctures absent; scutum punctures sparse (i= 1–6 pd), abruptly becoming moderately dense laterad of parapsidal line (i=1–2 pd), sculpture shiny to weakly tessellate, becoming more strongly tessellate anteromedially; scutellum punctures sparse (i= 1–6 pd), sculpture shiny to weakly tessellate; metanotum sculpture shiny to weakly imbricate and weakly rugulosopunctate; metapostnotum rugae strong or weak, anastomosing or subparallel, nearly reaching margin, sculpture shiny to imbricate; preëpisternum sculpture areolate-rugulose to rugose; hypoepimeron punctures moderately dense (i=1–2 pd), sculpture shiny to finely reticulate; mesepisternum punctures moderately sparse (i=1–3 pd), sculpture shiny to finely reticulate; metepisternum sculpture lineate dorsally, weakly rugulose ventrally; propodeum lateral face punctures obscure, sculpture tessellate to weakly rugulose; propodeum posterior face sculpture shiny to imbricate; T1 anterior face sculpture shiny; T1 dorsal surface punctures sparse (i =1–4 pd), absent or very sparse in large apicolateral oval patches and on rim, sculpture shiny; T2 disc punctures sparse (i=1–3 pd), disc sculpture shiny, rim punctures absent, rim sculpture shiny. STRUCTURE. Face length/width ratio 0.87 (± 0.03 SD). F1:pedicel length ratio 1.14 (± 0.33 SD); F2:F1 length ratio 1.86 (± 0.39 SD); F2 length/width ratio 1.53 (± 0.3 SD); F9 length/width ratio 1.21 (± 0.07 SD). Forewing with 3 submarginal cells; pronotal angle slightly obtuse, nearly right-angled; tegula shape normal. Intertegular distance 0.72 (± 0.03 SD) mm. Scutum length/width ratio 0.79 (± 0.03 SD); scutum/scutellum length ratio 2.96 (± 0.23 SD); scutellum/metanotum length ratio 1.41 (± 0.11 SD); metanotum/metapostnotum length ratio 0.71 (± 0.07 SD). Propodeum lateral carinae not reaching dorsal

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.551
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicBryophyte Studies and RecordsFrench-language works237,207