Rudolfina bucki Paiero & Marshall 2020, sp. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rudolfina bucki sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 2405E619-5A06-42BB-A033-00E43C70A5B6 Figs 8, 21B Etymology The specific name is a patronym for Dr. Matthias Buck, a friend and previous sphaerocerid taxonomist. Material examined Holotype MEXICO • ♂; Oaxaca, 4.1 mi. W of Jct. Mex. and 175- Yuvila Rd; 9300 ft a.s.l.; 8–19 Aug. 1973; A. Newton leg.; oak-fir-pine forest; FMNH debu01086238. Paratype MEXICO • 1 ♂; same collection data as for holotype; DEBU. Description Male BODY. Length 1.6mm. Eye height 2.5× genal height. Head with 3–4 interfrontal setae and 4–5 small setae on inner margin of orbital plate. Gena with 2 strong setae and 7–8 smaller setulae. Acrostichal setulae in 4–6 rows. Costagial seta extending to midpoint between humeral and subcostal break. Second costal sector 0.7–0.8 × third costal sector; length of M 1 between crossveins dm-cu and r-m 3.5× dm-cu; CuA 1 stub vein ~3.0× M 1 stub vein. Male mid femur with 5–7 strong ventral setae and a circular cluster of 5–10 weaker setae ventrobasally. Male mid tibia with ventral comb of 4–5 robust setae on apical ⅓, without an enlarged midventral seta. MALE ABDOMEN (Fig. 8). Sternite 5 with pair of medial triangular lobes on posterior margin, distance between lobes>1.0× basal width of single lobe, lobe length ~1/5 length of remainder of sternite. Transverse part of sternite 6 weakly arcuate. Epandrium strongly convex, with irregular cluster of 6–8 long, inclinate posterolateral setae (appearing fan-like in posterior view); subanal plate broad, complete. Surstylus with anterior lobe reduced to small basal swelling; posterior lobe elongate, clavate, weakly bent anteriorly on apical ⅓; apical half of posterior lobe covered in small setae, with 1 robust elongate seta on posterior margin and 4–5 strong setae on inner surface. Cercus small, conical, with strong preapical seta. Postgonite apically truncate. Dorsal sclerite of distiphallus (Fig. 8 E–G) without distinct swellings. Female Unknown. Remarks The male abdomen is similar to that of R. megepandria sp. nov., but males can be separated from that species by the shorter cercus and less pronounced epandrium.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.018 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".