Fig. 15 in Update to: Advancing butterfly systematics through genomic analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fig. 15. Selected specimens of Burnsius communis in dorsal (left) and ventral (right) views, data in text or below. a–d) Burnsius communis tenebrunis ssp. n.: a–b) types from USA, Oregon, Klamath Co.: a) holotype ♂ NVG-24064E07 and b) paratype ♀ NVG-23058A06 and c–d) non-type ♂♂ from Canada, British Columbia: c) NVG-24012E08 (slightly aberrant) and d) NVG-24012E09. e–f) Burnsius communis communis ♂♂ from Canada, Alberta, E. M. Pike leg. [CNC]: e) NVG-24012E07 Green Is., 18-Aug-1981 and f) NVG-24012E06 Finnegan, 18-Aug-1986. g–k) Burnsius communis altus ssp. n. from USA, California: g–i) Tuolumne Co.: g) holotype ♂ NVG-23057F09 and h–i) paratypes: h) ♀ NVG-23032C12 and i) ♀ NVG- 23032C11 and j–k) El Dorado Co. paratypes: j) ♂ NVG-24012E04 and k) ♂ NVG-24012E05. l–m) Burnsius communis communis specimens sympatric or collected near B. communis altus ssp. n. from USA, California: l) ♀ NVG-23032D01, WRD 22433 Tuolumne Co. (data exactly as NVG-23032C12, see text) and m–n) ♂♂ from El Dorado Co., S of Lake Tahoe, Cold Creek, D. L. Bauer leg., 8-Sep-1988 [MGCL]: m) NVG-23058C05 and n) NVG-23058C06.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.234 | 0.099 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".