MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6912353792 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3665060

Rudolfina pilosa Paiero & Marshall 2020, sp. nov.

2020· article· en· W6912353792 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiatoms and Algae Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaHolotypeCoxa varaFemurFlight feather

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rudolfina pilosa sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 8E664032-9FD5-4ED0-9A39-B63395A39655 Figs 18, 21C Etymology The species epithet is from the Latin for ‘hairy’, referring to the hirsute sternites 4 and 5 of the male. Material examined Holotype MEXICO • ♂; Oaxaca, 2.0 mi. W of Jct. Mex. 175- Yuvila Rd; 9500 ft a.s.l.; 8–19 Aug. 1973; A. Newton leg.; oak-pine, dung; FMNH debu01086240. Paratypes MEXICO – Oaxaca • 1 ♂; 6.6 mi. N of Ixtlan de Juarez; 8300 ft a.s.l.; 10–18 Aug. 1973; A. Newton leg.; oak woodland, human dung; DEBU • 1 ♂; 4.1 mi. W of Jct. Mex. 175- Yuvila Rd; 9300 ft a.s.l.; 8–19 Aug. 1973; A. Newton leg.; oak-fir-pine forest; UNAM • 1 ♂; same collection data as for preceding; oak-fir-pine forest; FMNH. Description BODY. Length: 1.5–1.8 mm. Eye height 2.5 × genal height. Head with 3 interfrontal setae and 5–6 small setae along inner margin of orbital plate. Gena with 2 strong setae and 7–9 smaller setulae. Acrostichal setulae in 4–6 rows. Costagial seta extending slightly beyond humeral break; second costal sector equal to third sector; length of M 1 between crossveins dm-cu and r-m 2.0× dm-cu; CuA 1 stub vein ~5.0 × M 1 stub vein. Male mid femur with 4–5 small setae in ventrobasal cluster. Male mid tibia with ventral comb of 7–8 robust setae on apical ½, midventral seta absent (female unknown). MALE ABDOMEN (Fig. 18). Sternite 3 and 4 with dense cluster of setae posteromedially. Posterior margin of sternite 5 with round teeth on each side of a medial emargination; emargination less than 1/6 width of sternite and extending ~½ length. Transverse part of sternite 6 weakly arcuate. Epandrium with one large pair of setae ventrolaterally, one smaller pair of setae lateral to larger pair, and several setulae scattered over surface; subanal plate broadly continuous below anal opening. Surstylus boot-shaped, posteriorly bent near base, hirsute with 3–5 setae on posterior lobe (heel) and numerous smaller setae on anterior lobe (toe). Cercus fused with epandrium, with distinct seta on ventral margin. Postgonite clavate, with several setulae on dorsal surface. Dorsal sclerite of distiphallus (Fig. 18 D–F) without distinct swellings and not extending beyond apex of acrophallus. Female Unknown. Remarks This species is most similar to R. newtoni sp. nov., which also has a setulose male sternite 4 and sternite 5. These species are easily distinguished by the shape of the male surstylus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.103

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicDiatoms and Algae Research→French-language works237,207→