MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6912356257 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.16575162

Perspectives and Insights on Antineoplastic Agents from Plant Alkaloids and Other Natural Products (L01C): From Development to New Drug Submission (NDS) Application for Health Canada

2025· article· en· W6912356257 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVincaDrugHuman healthHealth claims on food labelsPharmaceutical industryNatural (archaeology)Food and drug administrationGood manufacturing practice

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plant alkaloids and other natural products (ATC code L01C), such as vinca alkaloids and taxanes, are critical antineoplastic agents that disrupt cell division to treat cancers like leukemia, lymphoma, and solid tumors. These naturally derived compounds target microtubule dynamics, offering potent efficacy but requiring careful formulation to mitigate toxicity. This article reviews the L01C class’s pharmacology, chemical properties, container closure systems, safety profiles, and emerging technologies, such as nanoparticle delivery and albumin-bound formulations. It also outlines the regulatory pathway for submitting a New Drug Submission (NDS) to Health Canada, aligning with the Food and Drugs Act, Health Canada regulations, and ICH guidelines. Recommendations emphasize early regulatory engagement, robust pharmacovigilance, and innovative delivery systems to ensure safe, effective, and accessible therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.466
Threshold uncertainty score0.937

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0120.004
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0060.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicCancer Treatment and Pharmacology→French-language works237,207→