Bibliographic record
Abstract
Philoplitis Nixon, 1965: 267. Diagnosis. Adults of Philoplitis (Fig. 1) are distinguished by the following characteristics: palpi dark, with apical segments of maxillary palps paler; pronotum laterally with broad, crenulate dorsal groove and narrow ventral one; propleuron with lobe above coxae extending up and back over lower corner of pronotum; mesoscutum usually with carinate lateral margin above tegulae; scutellum coarsely punctate and greatly prolonged posteriorly over propodeum, being about as long as mesoscutum when measured from anterior margin of scutellar scrobe; metanotum punctate and withdrawn Figures Ι–2. Ι Habitus of Philoplitis masneri 2 Detail of the forewing of Philoplitis striatus showing the vein measurements. from scutellum exposing scutellar phragma, with anterior margin bearing long, cylindrical, apically setose process laterally; propodeum strongly rugose and bearing complete median longitudinal carina; mediotergite 1 rectangular and mediotergite 2 with truncate, smooth or sculptured pyramidal area; metatibiae with inner spur extending slightly beyond the middle of first tarsomere.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".