MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6912369247 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3790200

Lasionycta staudingeri

2009· article· en· W6912369247 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArcticSubspeciesThe arcticType (biology)Basal (medicine)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lasionycta staudingeri (Aurivillius) Figs 47–49, 163, 219. Map 13 Anarta schoenherri Staudinger, 1861: 373, not Zetterstedt, 1839. Anarta staudingeri Aurivillius, 1891a: 176. Replacement name for Anarta schoenherri Staudinger. Lasiestra staudingeri; McDunnough 1938: 71. Hada staudingeri; Hartig and Heinicke 1973: 193. Lasionycta staudingeri; Lafontaine et al. 1986: 261. Anarta zemblica Hampson, 1905: 47, syn. n. Anarta preblei Benjamin, 1933: 59. Lasiestra leucocycla preblei; McDunnough 1938: 72. Lasiestra preblei; Franclemont and Todd 1983: 149. Lasionycta staudingeri preblei; Lafontaine et al. 1986: 261. Lasionycta staudingeri sajanensis Kononenko, 1986, in Lafontaine et al. 1986: 263. Extralimital Type material. Anarta staudingeri: holotype [NHRS, not examined]. Type locality: Dovre, Norway. Anarta zemblica: holotype ♀ [BMNH, examined]. Type locality: Shuberta Bay, Zovaya Zembla, Russia. Anarta preblei: holotype ♁ [USNM, examined]. Type locality: St. Paul Island, Alaska. Diagnosis. Lasionycta staudingeri is a small arctic species with a mottled dark-gray forewing. Th e hindwing is typical for the sub-group, although those of some specimens are heavily suffused with black. Males of L. staudingeri, L. subfumosa, and L. dolosa differ from other Lasionycta in having a corona comprised of an irregular double row of setae. Th e base of the cucullus is mildly constricted and the digitus is small and shaped like an equilateral triangle. Females have a small corpus bursae with a weak mesial constriction. Lasionycta staudingeri and L. subfumosa are arctic species whereas L. dolosa occurs in Colorado. North American L. staudingeri belong to subspecies preblei (Benjamin) characterized by olive patches on the forewing and dark suffusion on the basal hindwing, features absent in L. subfumosa. Lasionycta staudingeri is also darker gray than L. subfumosa. Lasionycta staudingeri is similar to L. leucocycla with which it occurs. It can be separated from L. leucocycla without dissection by the absence of an ocellus in the orbicular spot (present in L. leucocycla), and by a more bipectinate male antenna (> 2× central shaft width in L. staudingeri; <2× shaft in L. leucocycla). Distribution and biology. Lasionycta staudingeri is Holarctic and the nominate subspecies occurs in Eurasia. In North America L. s. preblei is widely distributed north of the 60th parallel. This subspecies also occurs in the eastern Palaearctic (Lafontaine et al. 1986). Lasionycta staudingeri is diurnal and flies over dry scree tundra. Adults have been collected from late June to mid-August. The larva of L. staudingeri feeds on Empetrum nigrum L. in Finland and was described by Lafontaine et al. (1986). It is polyphagous when reared (Ahola and Silvonen 2008). Remarks. We follow Lafontaine et al. (1986) in treating North American populations as conspecific with Eurasian populations, although this has not been evaluated by DNA sequencing. Lasionycta subfumosa from Victoria Island and Alaska and L. dolosa from Colorado were previously treated as subspecies of L. staudingeri (Lafontaine et al. 1986).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.128

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicLepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy→French-language works237,207→