Bibliographic record
Abstract
Redescription of Thrypticus viridis Parent, 1932 (Fig. 5) Type material. HOLOTYPE ♂, labelled: “ Thrypticus viridis Par. n. sp. O. Parent Type [white label, handwritten]”; “Berlin Grünewald, 20.6.12 [handwritten] [white label]”; “coll. Oldenberg [white label]”; “Typus [red label]”; “Holotypus [red label]”; “ DEI Müncheberg Dip – 00819 [green label]”; “Gen. Prep. No. SN2020-13 det. S. Naglis 2020 [white label]” (SDEI). Genitalia originally dissected and imbedded in Canada Balsam; now placed in plastic tube filled with glycerin jelly. Diagnosis. Antennal scape yellow, pedicel partly yellow, postpedicel black, thorax and abdomen shiny metallic green, with yellow setae; legs entirely yellow; mid tibia with strong ad seta; scutellum with 2 strong marginal setae and 2 smaller lateral setae; surstylus and cercus yellow. Redescription. Male. Body length: genitalia dissected, wing length 2.3 mm. Head: frons shiny metallic green, with blue reflections, face shiny blue, with violet reflections, both with weak grey pruinosity; palpus dark brown, with strong yellow apical seta; proboscis brown; antenna with scape yellow, pedicel yellow with brown apical margin, postpedicel black, roundish, as long as high; arista apical, with microscopic pubescence; all postocular setae yellowish white. Thorax: mesonotum metallic green, with grey pruinosity; thoracic setae dark yellow; 5 pairs of strong dc (increasing in length towards scutellum); 7–9 pairs of short ac; scutellum with 2 strong marginal setae, with 2 smaller lateral setae; 2 strong yellow ppl; pleura concolorous (incl. pruinosity) with mesonotum. Legs: coxae yellow, basal half brownish, remaining legs yellow, except tarsomere 5 brown, setae and hairs yellow except as noted. Fore leg: coxa anteriorly with small hairs and strong apical setae; remaining leg without major setae; relative podomere ratios: 37/30/13:7:5:3:4. Mid leg: coxa with some small setae; femur without major setae; tibia with 1 strong, brown ad seta at basal 1/4; relative podomere ratios (tarsomeres 2-5 missing): 37/38/18. Hind leg: coxa with 2 strong lateral setae; remaining part of leg missing. Wing: hyaline, veins brown; basal section of M shorter than distal section; R 4+5 and M parallel; M joining costa at apex; CuAx ratio: 0.35; RMx ratio: 2.7; lower calypter yellowish white, with pale yellow setae; halter stem brown infuscated, knob yellow. Abdomen: shiny metallic green, with pale yellow hairs and setae. Hypopygium (Fig. 5): hypandrium with flattened, leaf-shaped apex; epandrial lobes fused, each with long seta of same length; cercus as long as surstylus, with obtuse apex; surstylus yellow, curved, pyriform, with 1 strong, yellow, inwardly curved ventral seta and 2 smaller apical setae.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".