MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912391761 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4477206

Rhamphomyia (Dasyrhamphomyia) nigrita

2020· article· en· W6912391761 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicDiptera species taxonomy and behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFoothillsHomonym (biology)ShoreRappaport

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rhamphomyia (Dasyrhamphomyia) nigrita (Zetterstedt) (Fig. 13) Rhamphomyza nigrita Zetterstedt, 1838: 567. Type-locality: Greenland. Other references: Barták & Danielson, 2007: 107 (type data); Sinclair et al., 2019: 24 (full list of references). R. (Dasyrhamphomyia) nigrita: Frey, 1922: 66 (key); Frey, 1955b: 518 (revision); Sinclair et al., 2019: 24 (Nearctic faunal survey, redescription). R. (Rhamphomyia) nigrita: Chvála & Wagner, 1989: 288 (catalogue); Shamshev, 2001b: 333 (key); Yang et al., 2007: 186 (catalogue); Barták, 2015: 576 (Greenland fauna); Shamshev, 2016: 78 (checklist). Empis borealis Fabricius, 1780: 211 (junior primary homonym of Empis borealis Linnaeus, 1758). Type-locality: Greenland. Rhamphomyia conservativa Malloch, 1919: 48. Type-locality: Bernard Harbour, Nunavut, Canada. Material examined. RUSSIA. Chukotka AO (Wrangel Island): middle flow of Neozhidannaya River, 71°01′N 179°09′E, BT 2, YPT, 12–16.vii.2016, LFV (1 ♂, ZIN); environs of Somnitelnaya Bay, 6.vii.1972, KBG (1 ♀, ZIN); 4 km N of Somnitelnaya Bay, Somnitelnaya River, shore slope and flood-lands, 28.vii.1972, KBG (2 ♂, 1 ♀, ZIN); 5 km N of Somnitelnaya Bay, valley of Somnitelnaya River, foothills 150 m, on flowers of Dryas, 25, 28.vii.1972, KBG (2 ♀, ZIN); Somnitelnaya Bay, valley of Somnitelnaya River, Mineev Mtns, 150 m, pebbles, on flower of Potentilla emarginata, 22.vii.1966, KBG (1 ♀, ZIN); same locality, south slope of Mineev Mtns, 100 m, pebbles, rubbly placer, 26.vii.1966, KBG (1 ♀, ZIN); same locality, Sw on Epilobium latifolium L., 23.vii.1971, KBG (1 ♀, ZIN); basin of Khischniki River, 8 km SE of Sovetskaya Mtn, lawn near stream, 250 m, 13.vii.1972, KBG (1 ♂, ZIN); environs of Tundrovaya Mtn, near stream, 18.vii.1972, KBG (1 ♀, ZIN); same locality, tundra, 18.vii.1972, KBG (2 ♂, 2 ♀, ZIN); same locality, 71°18′N, 179°48′W, BT 3, PT, 1–19.vii.2015, LFV (1 ♀, ZIN); same locality, BT 5, 1–19.vii.2015, PT, LFV (1 ♀, ZIN); same locality, BT 1, 71°18.342′N 179°48.367′W, 30.vi.–6.vii.2018, U. V. Babiy (1 ♀, ZIN); middle flow of Mamontovaya River, N Perkatkun, osier-bed in river valley, 17, 21.vii.1972, KBG (4 ♂, 2 ♀, ZIN); same locality and collector, 21.vii.1972 (19 ♂, 11 ♀, ZIN); same locality and collector, 29.vii.1972 (1 ♂, ZIN); same locality and collector, 18.vii.1972 (1 ♂, 2 ♀, ZIN); same locality, BT 4, 71°09′N 179°45′W, 26.vi.– 19.vii.2011, А.А. Rodionov (1 ♀, ZIN); same locality, 71°10′N 179°45′W, in house, 29.vi., 1.vii. 2015, OAK (2 ♀, ZIN); same locality, BT 20 A, Sw, 1–2.vii.2015, OAK (2 ♂, 3 ♀, ZIN); same locality, BT 14, Sw, 2.vii.2015, OAK (7 ♂, 19 ♀, ZIN); same locality, BT 3, Sw, 1.vii.2015, OAK (1 ♂, 4 ♀, ZIN); same locality, BT 2, Sw, 2.vii.2015, OAK (2 ♂, ZIN); same locality, BT 1 A, Sw, 2.vii.2015, OAK (1 ♂, 1 ♀, ZIN); same locality and biotope, YPT, 2–4.vii.2015, OAK (1 ♂, 1 ♀, ZIN); same locality, BT 7, Sw, 1.vii.2015, OAK (1 ♂, 6 ♀, ZIN); same locality, BT 6, Sw, 2–3.vii.2015, OAK (5 ♂, 5 ♀, ZIN); same locality, BT 6 A, Sw, 1.vii.2015, OAK (1 ♀, ZIN); same locality, BT 11, Sw, 30.vi.2015, OAK (1 ♀, ZIN); same locality, BT 5, Sw, 30.vi.2015, OAK (2 ♀, ZIN); same locality, BT 10, Sw, 30.vi.2015, OAK (1 ♀, ZIN); same locality, BT 17, Sw, 3.vii.2015, OAK (9 ♀, ZIN); same locality, Arctic fox burrow, Sw, 1.vii.2015, OAK (1 ♂, 1 ♀, ZIN); same locality and biotope, PT, 1–23.vii.2015, OAK (1 ♀, ZIN); same locality and biotope, Sw, 18.vii.2019, OAK (1 ♀, ZIN); brook Vesely, 71°11′N, 179°43′W, BT A, Sw, 18.vii.2019, OAK (1 ♂, ZIN); spurs of Pervaya Mtn, 71°09′N, 179°27′W, BT 11, Sw, 28.vi.2015, OAK (5 ♂, 3 ♀, ZIN); same locality and biotope, Sw, 13.vii.2015, OAK (1 ♀, ZIN); upper flow of Neizvestnaya River, 71°13′N, 179°19′W, BT 4 A, Sw 5.vii.2006, OAK (11 ex., SZM); same locality, BT 7 A, 5.vii.2006, OAK (1 ex., SZM); same locality, BT 3 A, 6.vii.2006, OAK (1 ex., SZM); same locality, BT 12, Sw, 6.vii.2015, OAK (3 ♂, 2 ♀, ZIN); same locality, BT 5 A, PT, 26.vi.–10.vii.2015, OAK (1 ♀, ZIN); same locality and biotope, Sw, 12.vii.2015, OAK (1 ♀, ZIN); same locality, BT 3 B, Sw, 7.vii.2015, OAK (1 ♀, ZIN); same locality, BT C1, Sw, 21.vi.2015, OAK (3 ♀, ZIN); same locality, wormwoods near house, Sw, 24.vi.2015, OAK (1 ♂, ZIN); middle flow of Neizvestnaya River, BT 1, YPT, 71°20.287′N 179°29.779′W, 5–14.vii.2018, U. V. Babiy (1 ♀, ZIN); same locality, BT 2, YPT, 71°20.416′N 179°29.651′W, 13–14.vii.2018, U. V. Babiy (2 ♀, ZIN). Recognition. Large (wing length 6–7 mm) brownish grey species. Male (Fig. 13) holoptic; thorax black setose, scutum densely brownish grey pruinescent, with dark vittae beneath acrostichal and dorsocentral rows; mesonotal setae mostly fine, long, presutural dc and acr multiserial; legs robust, entirely dark brown, hind femur without setae on about apical 2/3 ventrally, only densely pale pilose, hind tibia evenly thickened toward apex; wing brownish infuscate, halter yellowish; cerci directed anteriorly, very long, extended nearly to middle of abdominal tergite 3, epandrium dark. Female wing broadened; legs without pennate setae. Distribution. A Holarctic species with huge area of distribution; in Eurasia, R. nigrita is widespread across the low and high arctic of Norway, Sweden and Russia (with some records from the boreal zone; e.g., Altay, Magadanskaya Province); in North America, from Greenland to Alaska and as far south as Churchill, Manitoba and northern British Columbia (Sinclair et al. 2019). However, among the Russia Arctic islands, R. nigrita was found only from Wrangel Island. Habitat. On Wrangel Island this species is most common in the warmer central region of the island, where it is found in various biotopes. In colder areas (Neozhidannaya River, coastal plain in Somnitelnaya Bay), a single specimen was found.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.148 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicDiptera species taxonomy and behaviorFrench-language works237,207