Bibliographic record
Abstract
Shipsa rotunda (Claassen, 1923) Notes Shipsa rotunda is commonly known as the Intrepid Forestfly (Stark et al. 2012). This species has a very broad distribution extending from mainland Labrador and New Brunswick west through Alaska, in parallel manner from the New England states west through the Laurentian Great Lakes region, and from Maryland south to Georgia and west to Arkansas (Grubbs and Baumann 2021, DeWalt et al. 2024, Grubbs and Baumann 2023). Harper (1973 a) examined the life history of S. rotunda in Ontario and found that larvae exhibited a univoltine-fast life cycle. Emergence began in May and first instar larvae were present in November, growing steadily until emergence the following spring. Barton (1980) found a similar fast univoltine life cycle for this species in Alberta, except larvae experienced a slowed growth period during the winter months. Adult collection dates from this study range from mid-April through mid-June (Fig. 18). In New York, S. rotunda was collected from elevations ranging from 101-621 m asl (Fig. 19) from larger streams and rivers in Level III Ecoregions Northestern Highlands (58) and Eastern Great Lakes Lowlands (83) (Fig. 21 b). Nymphs were commonly encountered in leaf packs including those found in seasonally inundated floodplain habitats.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".