MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912394995 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3791257

Philoplitis punctatus Fernandez-Triana & Goulet 2009, sp. n.

2009· article· en· W6912394995 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMollusks and Parasites Studies
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSimple eye in invertebratesScutellumClawApex (geometry)DorsumSetaBeakRidge

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Philoplitis punctatus sp. n. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: F1ADE1DF-9FE6-4166-BAF2-DD26D15E22C7 Diagnosis. The black coloration of P. punctatus distinguishes it from P. striatus and P. coniferens; the transverse mediotergite 2 separates it from P. masneri (with a broader mediotergite 2); and the length of inner metatibial spur and shape of mediotergite 2 distinguishes this species from P. adustipalpus. It also has the shortest scutellar disc and the most coarsely sculptured mesoscutum within the genus. Description. Head densely rugosopunctate, frons transversely striated, small and impressed area behind posterior ocelli (and reaching to the central part of the occiput) rather smooth but with some striation. Antenna long, length of 2nd flagellomere 2.7× its width, length of 15th flagellomere 3.0× its width. Mesosoma with rather dense and long pubescence. Mesoscutum with coarse punctures medially and along anterior and lateral margins (the last one above tegulae), and notauli deeply impressed with coarse punctures (Fig. 5, 8 and 11). Scutellum coarsely punctate, relatively short (length/width ratio 0.92×), scutellar disc length 0.77× that of mesoscutum, in lateral view with apex toward dorsal surface. Mesopleura mostly punctate, with median smooth area below speculum and some striation marking the sternaulus; metapleuron punctate. Propodeum rugose and with complete median longitudinal carina. Forewing ratios: r/3RSa: 1.00; r/r-m: 1.00; r/2RS: 0.50; 3RS/2M: 0.60; 2RS/2M: 1.20; r-m/2M: 0.60; r /(r-2M): 0.35; height of 2nd submarginal cell/(r-2M): 0.50. Tarsal claws with 3 teeth and with arolium enlarged, about twice as long as claw length; metafemur thick, its length 3.08× its maximum width; inner spur of metatibia 0.58× the length of first tarsomere. Metasoma with apical half of mediotergite 1 finely sculptured, its length 2.00× its width at apex; mediotergite 2 smooth (except for three transverse striae centrally), with medial zone outlined by sharp convexities, its medial length 0.46 its width at apex (Fig. 15); tergum 3+ smooth. Color. Head black with clypeus brown, mandibles yellowish and palpi dark brown with apical 4–5 maxillary palps light brown. Scape and pedicel yellowish-brown, rest of antenna dark brown. Mesosoma black with silver pubescence, tegula dark brown. Legs brown (the first pair lighter, the third pair dark brown, almost black), protibiae and protarsi yellow (except the last tarsomere which is dark brown); metatibial spurs dark brown. Wing veins and stigma brown (Rs + M hyaline), with a brownish cloud beneath stigma that extends to 2M. Metasoma mostly dark brown; except for sterna 1–3, apical strip on mediotergite 1, and basal strip on mediotergite 2, which are yellowishwhite; mediotergite 2 otherwise light brown. Etymology. The name alludes to the distinctive, coarse punctures medially, anteriorly and laterally on the mesoscutum. Material examined. Holoytpe ♁ (CNC type 23529). THAILAND: Khankaen Prov., Phu Pha Man Natl. Pk, 48Q 018044, 350 m, UTM 7854124, 24–31.VII.2005.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicMollusks and Parasites StudiesFrench-language works237,207