Paragrallomyia ecuadoriensis Ferro & Marshall 2020, new species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Paragrallomyia ecuadoriensis new species (Figs. 27–28) Description (female only): Body length 6 mm; wing 4 mm. Head brown, thorax black and abdomen dark brown. Palpus brown except for white outer face. Clypeus brown with sparse pale microsetulae. First flagellomere dark brown. Fronto-orbital plate yellowish-brown. Row of katepisternal setae brownish. Fore tibia dark brown. Fore tarsus mostly white, tarsomere one brown on basal half only. Hind femur mostly dark brown, white on basal quarter and with a small angled preapical white ring. Tergites dark brown. Oviscape dark brown. Head: First flagellomere covered by pale microsetulae. Frontal vitta uniformly brown, without a darkened spot anterior to ocellar plate. Frontal vitta flat, not swollen anterior to ocellar plate. Epicephala converging, not immediately merging posterior to ocellar plate (Fig. 27). Epicephalon somewhat swollen above frontal vitta level. Thorax: Mesonotum with lines of thin brownish microsetulae. Anterior half of postpronotal lobe bare. Femur covered with sparse black microsetulae. Mid and hind tibia flattened, sulcus on outer face strongly pronounced and curved. Cervical sclerite brown with a rounded swelling. Cell r 4+5 open at the tip of the wing. Abdomen: Single spermathecal duct smooth and with a small swelling apically. Single spermatheca smooth and cylindrical. Paired spermathecal duct uniformly thick, with an apical rounded swelling. Paired spermathecal duct stems tapered on basal third, broader and convoluted on apical half (Fig. 28). Paired spermathecae oval and smooth. Type material: Holotype: ECUADOR. Napo, Yasuni National Park: PUCE Yasuni research station, Malaise trap in rain forest, 76º36’ W 00º38’ S, 3–20.XI.1998, T. Tape & B. Viklund (1♀, DEBU00178981, QCAZ). Paratype: Napo, Yasuni National Park: PUCE Yasuni research station, Malaise trap in rain forest, 76º36’ W 00º38’ S, 3–20.XI.1998, T. Tape & B. Viklund (1♀, GNM). Distribution: Ecuador. Comments: P. ecuadoriensis is similar to P. citrina, but its mid and hind tibiae are conspicuously flattened and curved. The thick and twisted paired spermathecal duct stems also make this species distinct.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".