Bibliographic record
Abstract
Trichoclinocera lapponica (Ringdahl) (Figs 4, 5) Atalanta lapponica Ringdahl, 1933: 281. Type locality (by lectotype designation): Tjuonjatjakko, Sweden. Other references: Chvála & Wagner, 1989: 335 (catalogue). Trichoclinocera lapponica: Sinclair, 1994: 1023 (revision, lectotype designation, redescription). Material examined. CANADA. Quebec [new records since Sinclair (1994)]: 10 km SW Tasiujaq, trib. of Finger River, 17.viii.1996, B.J. Sinclair (7 ♂, CNC). RUSSIA. Chukotka AO (Wrangel Island): middle flow of Neozhidannaya River, 71°01′N, 179°09′W, BT, YPT, 8–9.vii.2019, OAK (1 ♀, ZIN); Somnitelnaya River, on water, water temperature +5, air temperature +2.5, 3.viii.1971, KBG (10 ♂, 3 ♀, ZIN); same locality, under pebble near water, 3.viii.1971, KBG (2 ♂, 1 ♀, ZIN); SW Sovetskaya Mtn, upper flow of Khrustalnaya River, 3.viii.1971, KBG (2 ♂, 12 ♀, ZIN); same locality, snowfield, on water, air temperature +3, water temperature +7, snowfall, 4.viii.1971, KBG, Chelnokov (1 ♂, 7 ♀, ZIN); environs of Tundrovaya Mtn, 71°17.863′N, 179°47.875′W, BT 2, YPT, 7–11.vii.2019, U. V. Babiy (1 ♀, ZIN); middle flow of Mamontovaya River, N Perkatkun, on emergent stone in river, 29.vii.1972, KBG (3 ♂, 1 ♀, ZIN). Recognition. Among clinocerines, Trichoclinocera is distinguished by the presence of setae on vein R 1. This species is distinguished readily by its dorsoventrally flattened tarsomeres 4 and 5, convex face and small eyes (Figs 4, 5). Distribution. Holarctic species known from northern Finland and Sweden as well as it is widespread throughout the arctic region of North America (Sinclair 1994); recorded for the first time from the territory of Russia. Habitat. On Wrangel Island, this species was collected mainly on pebble floodplains, near water.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".