Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lasionycta subfuscula sub-group This sub-group includes only L. subfuscula, a moderately large gray species with distinct dark lines and spots, including the claviform spot. It resembles members of the L. perplexa sub-group. Males have the widest antenna of any Lasionycta, over 4× as wide as the central shaft, and are easily identified without magnification. Females are the only species in the species-group in which the corpus bursae is angled 30° leftward at its junction with the ductus bursae. The valve is elongate with a moderate constriction at the base of the cucullus. The costa is angled slightly ventrad beyond the digitus. Th e costal lobe is prominent, extending above the valve margin. Th e cucullus is smaller relative to the valve than in the L. perplexa sub-group, and bears a corona of a singe row of setae. The digitus is angled 30° to the valve axis and is relatively long and slender. Th e female appendix bursae is slightly more slender than those of the L. perplexa sub-group. CO1 distance analysis suggests that L. subfuscula is a sister group to a large assemblage containing the species of the L. leucocycla and L. perplexa sub-groups, L. staudingeri, and L. subfumosa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".