Effectiveness of Audio-Visual Presentation on the Performance of Grade 6 Learning in Araling Panlipunan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study aimed to determine the effectiveness of audio-visual presentations on the performance of Grade 6 learners in Araling Panlipunan. In this study, learners in the Control group obtained a mean of 17.85 and the Experimental group obtained a mean of 24.64 during their post-test. Both groups actually improved in their performance but the performance of the Experimental group was much higher than the Control group with the former being exposed to the use of audio-visual presentation in the teaching of Araling Panlipunan to the Grade 6 learners. There is a significant difference in the performance of grade 6 learners in Araling Panlipunan along the topics in fourth quarter after the exposure of audiovisual presentation in teaching Araling Panlipunan 6. Using the audio-visual presentation in teaching Araling Panlipunan 6, the performance of Grade 6 learners can be improved and changed for the better.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".