MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912447385 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3866583

Neofidia Strother

2020· article· en· W6912447385 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicDiptera species taxonomy and behavior
Canadian institutionsMerck Canada Inc. (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEtymologyGenusType (biology)Specific name

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Genus Neofidia Strother nom. nov. Fidia Dejean, 1836: 412 (catalog), nom. nud. Atonia Gistel, 1848: 123 (nec Williston 1889, Diptera: Asilidae) (synonym of Fidia Dejean), nom. nud. Fidia Baly, 1863: 153 (nec Motschulsky 1861: 22) (original description). Fidea Glover, 1868: 71 (misspelling). Fidia Dejean, 1836 – Dejean 1837: 436 (catalog). — Sturm 1843: 295 (catalog). — Crotch 1873: 33 (faunal treatment, species description). — Chapuis 1874: 275 (classification). Atonia – Gistel 1851: 123. Fidia Baly, 1863 – Gemminger & Harold 1874: 3376 (catalog). — Lefèvre 1877: 164 (species descriptions); 1885: 75 (catalog, species description). — Henshaw 1885: 108 (catalog). — Lefèvre 1885: 75 (catalog, species description). — Horn 1892: 198 (faunal treatment, species description). — Blatchley 1910: 1142 (faunal treatment). — Clavareau 1914: 76 (catalog). — Leng 1920: 293 (catalog). — Blackwelder 1946: 662 (checklist). — Bechyné 1950: 288 (taxonomic treatment); 1953: 249 (catalog). — Wilcox 1954: 402 (faunal treatment). — Arnett 1963: 928 (faunal treatment). — Balsbaugh & Hays 1972: 73 (faunal treatment). — Riley et al. 2003: 151 (catalog). — Ciegler 2007: 168 (faunal treatment). — Strother et al. 2007: 36 (nomenclature). Fidia – Walsh, 1867: 87 (species description). — Wilcox 1975: 57 (checklist). — Seeno & Wilcox 1982: 62 (checklist). — Arnett 1985: 376 (faunal treatment). — LeSage 1991: 309 (faunal treatment). — Flowers 1996: 36 (checklist). — Riley et al. 2002: 671 (catalog). Type species Fidia lurida Baly, 1863: 153 (not Fidia lurida Dejean, 1836, nom. nud.) Etymology The name Neofidia alludes to the new name for Fidia Baly, 1863, as well as its Nearctic and Neotropical distribution. The gender is feminine. Checklist of species Neofidia albovittata (Lefèvre, 1877) comb. nov. Fidia albovittata Lefèvre, 1877: 166 Fidia sallei Lefèvre, 1877: 166 Fidia sallaei Jacoby, 1882: 167 [unjustified emendation] Fidia unistriata Jacoby, 1882: 168 Neofidia cana (Horn, 1892) comb. nov. Fidia cana Horn, 1892: 199 (Fidia) Neofidia clematis (Schaeffer, 1904) comb. nov. Fidia clematis Schaeffer, 1904: 227 Neofidia comalensis (Strother in Strother & Staines, 2008) comb. nov. Fidia comalensis Strother in Strother & Staines, 2008: 29 Neofidia confusa (Strother, 2003) comb. nov. Fidia confusa Strother, 2003: 151 Fidia murina Crotch, 1873: 33 [not Glover, 1868: 71] Neofidia convexicollis (Strother in Strother & Staines, 2008) comb. nov. Fidia convexicollis Strother in Strother & Staines, 2008: 33 Neofidia costaricensis (Strother in Strother & Staines, 2008) comb. nov. Fidia costaricensis Strother in Strother & Staines, 2008: 35 Neofidia delilahae (Strother in Strother & Staines, 2008) comb. nov. Fidia delilahae Strother in Strother & Staines, 2008: 37 Neofidia dicelloposthe (Strother in Strother & Staines, 2008) comb. nov. Fidia dicelloposthe Strother in Strother & Staines, 2008: 38 Neofidia dichroma (Strother in Strother & Staines, 2008) comb. nov. Fidia dichroma Strother in Strother & Staines, 2008: 39 Neofidia guatemalensis (Jacoby, 1879) comb. nov. Fidia guatemalensis Jacoby, 1879: 778 Neofidia humeralis (Lefèvre, 1877) comb. nov. Fidia humeralis Lefèvre, 1877: 165 Fidia plagiata Lefèvre, 1877: 165 Neofidia longipes (Melsheimer, 1847) comb. nov. Eumolpus longipes Melsheimer, 1847: 169 Pachnephorus viticolus Uhler, 1855: 418 Neofidia lurida (Baly, 1863) comb. nov. Fidia lurida Baly, 1863: 153 Colaspis flavescens Sturm, 1826: 123 [nom. nud.] Fidia lurida Dejean, 1836: 412 [nom. nud.] Fidia viticida Walsh, 1867: 87 Neofidia marraverpa (Strother in Strother & Staines, 2008) comb. nov. Fidia marraverpa Strother in Strother & Staines, 2008: 49 Neofidia papillata (Strother in Strother & Staines, 2008) comb. nov. Fidia papillata Strother in Strother & Staines, 2008: 50 Neofidia pedestris (Lefèvre, 1877) comb. nov. Fidia pedestris Lefèvre, 1877: 164 Neofidia pedinops (Strother in Strother & Staines, 2008) comb. nov. Fidia pedinops Strother in Strother & Staines, 2008: 54 Fidia murina Dejean, 1836: 412 [nom. nud.] Neofidia rileyorum (Strother in Strother & Staines, 2008) comb. nov. Fidia rileyorum Strother in Strother & Staines, 2008: 56 Neofidia spuria (Lefèvre, 1877) comb. nov. Fidia spuria Lefèvre, 1877: 165 Fidia atra Jacoby, 1882: 168 (not Motschulsky, 1861) Neofidia texana (Schaeffer, 1933) comb. nov. Fidia viticida var. texana Schaeffer, 1933: 472 Neofidia tibialis (Jacoby, 1890) comb. nov. Fidia tibialis Jacoby, 1890: 232 Neofidia xanthonioides (Strother in Strother & Staines, 2008) comb. nov. Fidia xanthonioides Strother in Strother & Staines, 2008: 94 Remarks Strother & Staines (2008) provided a diagnosis and description of the genus. Both the genera, Fidia Motschulsky, 1861 and Neofidia Strother nom. nov., belong to the same tribe, Adoxini Baly, 1863 (sensu Moseyko & Kirejtshuk 2013). The Old World genus Fidia can be separated from the New World genus Neofidia Strother nom. nov. by the presence of a tooth on the ventral side of all femora (absent in Neofidia Strother nom. nov.). Another character mentioned by Strother & Staines (2008), the absence of paired apical spurs on the apex of fore tibia, cannot be used for separating these genera as spurs are present in some species of Fidia, at times being small and poorly visible. Among the Old World genera, Neofidia Strother nom. nov. is mostly close to Aoria Baly, 1863 and the similar genera Aloria Bryant, 1939 and Bromius Chevrolat in Dejean, 1836. It can be separated from Aoria by simple intercoxal mesothoracic process (bifurcated or with two spines in Aoria), from Aloria by 11-segmented antennae (9-segmented in Aloria) and from Bromius by the straight fore margin of lateral arms of pronotum (“propleura” of Jacoby 1908; convex in Bromius). Distribution North and Central America (Strother & Staines 2008) Generic diagnosis Body oblong, punctate-setose, frons and vertex hardly differentiated, antenna filiform, longer than ½ to ¾ of body length, second antennomere shorter than first, longer than half of it, shorter than next four or five. Compound eyes lateral, convex and entire, antennal calli triangular, pronotum as long as wide or gently wider than long, narrower than elytra, without lateral margins, fore margin of lateral arms of pronotum (‘propleuron’) straight, legs long and slender, tibia longitudinally carinate, all femora lack a ventral tooth, intermediate and posterior tibiae not emarginate preapically, apex of each tibia with a pair of small spurs, claws bifid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.121

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.146 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicDiptera species taxonomy and behaviorFrench-language works237,207