MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912465189 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5675201

Ceratoppia

2011· article· en· W6912465189 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicStudy of Mite Species
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTemperate rainforestRange (aeronautics)RainforestHabitatTemperate climateArboreal locomotionBorealTemperate forest

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Distribution of Ceratoppia in western North America All species described here are considered to have a North American coastal temperate rainforest distribution (Fig. 39). Ceratoppia indentata and C. longicupsis are the dominant Ceratoppia for temperate rainforests on the west coast of North America. Ceratoppia tofinoensis has a restricted distribution within the Pacific Northwest, however, this may reflect sampling bias due to a strictly arboreal habitat. All species except C. valerieae appear endemic to this rare ecozone. Ceratoppia valerieae is frequently encountered in coastal forests, generally occurring in low abundance, yet is the dominant Ceratoppia for interior southern British Columbia through to southwestern Alberta. The distribution range of C. offarostrata appears limited to coastal locations on Vancouver Island and Haida Gwaii, British Columbia, but could be due to habitat specificity. Variation in body size and relative lengths of posterior setae were observed in northern and southern range for C. valerieae, and southern populations of C. indentata. Ceratoppia offarostrata exhibited variation in posterior setae length on Haida Gwaii, where specimens collected had slightly shorter posterior setae and reduced rostral bump. North American coastal temperate rainforests have high tree and other plant diversity, high habitat heterogeneity and diversity of microhabitats compared to other temperate or boreal forest systems. Well-developed forest floor organic layers, long-lived trees with complex architecture, and epiphytic plant and lichen habitats may also help explain the high oribatid mite diversity encountered in these forests. However, why Ceratoppia and other members of the family Peloppiidae are especially species rich in these systems remains unclear. In addition to the five new species I describe, C. quadridentata arctica was observed on the west coast of Vancouver Island, British Columbia within the temperate rainforest biogeoclimatic zone, however, only in alpine and high elevation areas. Hammer (1955) first described the subspecies of C. quadridentata (C. quadridentata arctica Hammer, 1955) from Alaska. In Canada the subspecies has been found in the three northern territories, and northern areas of Alberta, Quebéc, and Newfoundland, however a wider distribution of C. quadridentata arctica is suspected. For example, in collections for western Canada, C. quadridentata arctica was found in samples from northern British Columbia (Charlie Lake, Fort St. John), as well as high elevation and subalpine areas of the British Columbia temperate zone (Heather Mt. subalpine, Vancouver Island, at 1097m; Comox Glacier meadow, Vancouver Island, at 1840m; Lost Shoe Creek at Hwy 4, Vancouver Island; Manning Provincial Park, at 1768m). Increased sampling efforts will reveal more robust distribution patterns for all species of Ceratoppia in North America. For example, in Canada, C. bipilis (Hermann, 1804) is known from all provinces and territories except British Columbia and Saskatchewan, but given its holarctic distribution (e.g. Sweden, England, France, Germany, Italy, Holland, Switzerland) (Trägårdh 1910) and presence in northern regions of other Canadian provinces, further sampling will probably reveal this species in the northern areas of these provinces. Other Ceratoppia listed for Canada appear well defined, but less common. For example, C. sexpilosa has been recorded from eastern Russia, and Yukon Territory, while C. sphaerica is listed in Canada from the northern territories, and has a Boreal forest distribution (Siberia, East Greenland) (Trägårdh 1910). Additionally, there are possibly three (or more) undescribed

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.721
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0800.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.128 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicStudy of Mite SpeciesFrench-language works237,207