MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6912477455 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3755980

Indigenizing the next decade of astronomy in Canada

2019· article· en· W6912477455 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of CanadaCampion College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousInclusion (mineral)ObligationAgency (philosophy)CommissionDiversity (politics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada published its calls to action in 2015 with 94 recommendations. Many of these 94 recommendations are directly related to education, language, and culture, some of which the Canadian Astronomy community can address and contribute to as part of reconciliation. The Canadian Astronomy community has an additional obligation since it benefits from facilities on Indigenous territories across Canada and the world. Furthermore, Indigenous people are still underrepresented at all levels in Canadian astronomy. The purpose of this Community Paper is to develop recommendations for the Canadian astronomy community to support Indigenous inclusion in the science community, support Indigenous learning by developing Indigenous-based learning materials and facilitate access to professionals and science activities, and to recognize and acknowledge the great contributions of Indigenous communities to our science activities. As part of this work we propose the ten following recommendations for CASCA as an organization and throughout this Community Paper we will include additional recommendations for individuals: astronomers, students and academics. The ten recommendations are: That CASCA partner with Indigenous organizations to support Indigenous education and diversity in astronomy and STEM. CASCA should collaborate with Indigenous language teachers and programs to develop astronomical learning material in Indigenous languages. This could be done through a dedicated CASCA committee on Indigenizing Astronomy. That CASCA collaborate with the National Research Council Herzberg, the Canadian Space Agency and other facilities to create programs in which a share of the telescope time is used for programs that promote education and inclusion for Indigenous and underrepresented people and schools in Canada and around the world. That CASCA expand the CASCA-Westar program, to fund training and support for volunteers and requires these programs to have multi-year plans to continually build and support connections with Indigenous communities and create long-lasting impact. That CASCA create scholarships and funding specifically for Indigenous peoples to participate in physics and astronomy. That CASCA advocate for diversity hiring initiatives at the postdoctoral and faculty level, and hold university policies to account. That CASCA should set targets to increase Indigenous participation at all levels of membership that are consistent with the general demographics and take actions to encourage greater involvement, including the creation of new membership categories. Detailed historical, political, social and cultural context about Indigenous peoples in lands where Canada uses facilities such as Hawaii, Arizona, Chile, Australia, South Africa and other regions needs to be available to any CASCA members in leadership positions. This could be done by producing training material including information about Indigenous peoples in Canada and the different regions of the world where the Canadian astronomy community is active. That CASCA funds the development of a diversity training program for faculty, post-docs and students that directly educates on issues regarding Indigeneity in Canada and in the world. That CASCA offers funding for students, post-docs and faculty to participate in diversity, equity, inclusion organizations such as caISEs, SACNAS, that promote the inclusion of Indigenous peoples in STEM. That CASCA becomes an example for other countries for its programs regarding Indigenizing astronomy and share its educational material around the world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score0.943

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0390.010
Scholarly communication0.0200.005
Open science0.0050.011
Research integrity0.0080.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights→French-language works237,207→