MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912483571 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5103637

Erythmelus (Erythmelus) burtik S. Triapitsyn 2007, sp. n.

2007· article· en· W6912483571 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPedicelSetaScapeAntenna (radio)ScutellumHolotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Erythmelus (Erythmelus) burtik S. Triapitsyn, sp. n. (Figs 26, 27) Type material. Holotype female on slide [CNCI]: CANADA. ONTARIO, Hamilton, 31.vii.1980, M. Sanborne. Paratypes: CANADA. ONTARIO, Hamilton: 13.vii.1980, M. Sanborne [1 female on point, CNCI]; 30.vi–7.vii.1981, M. Sanborne [1 female on point, CNCI]; 14–15.vii.1981, M. Sanborne [1 female on slide, UCRC]. Description. FEMALE (holotype and paratypes). Body length 1024–1273 µm. Body mostly dark brown except base of gaster whitish to light brown, hypopygium brown, and midlobe of mesoscutum with a slightly lighter (brown) transverse submedian stripe. Antenna brown except pedicel light brown. Procoxa, mesocoxa, base of metacoxa, femora, protibia, mesotibia, and most of metatibia brown; metacoxa whitish distally; base of metatibia and tarsi yellow to light brown. Vertex transversely striate, with a few short setae. Antenna (Fig. 26) with short setae. Scape 3.8–4.0 x as long as wide; pedicel much longer than F1; all funicular segments longer than wide; F1 the shortest funicular segment, F2 a little shorter than F3, F3 a little shorter than F4, F2–F4 each shorter than F5 or F6, F5 about as long as F6 (F5 slightly longer); F1–F4 without longitudinal sensilla, F5 and F6 each with 2 longitudinal sensilla; clava 3.8–4.0 x as long as wide, usually with 6 longitudinal sensilla but with 7 such sensilla on one antenna in the holotype. Mesosoma. Mesoscutum wider than long, its midlobe finely longitudinally striate and with 1 pair of strong setae. Axillar seta about as long as 1/3 length of scutellum. Scutellum slightly shorter than mesoscutum, posterior scutellum finely longitudinally striate. Dorsellum broadly angulate posteriorly. Wings. Forewing (Fig. 27) 4.1–4.2 x as long as wide; blade slightly infumate behind submarginal vein, otherwise hyaline, with unevenly distributed setae only in the distal 1/3; longest marginal cilia 1.2–1.3 x greatest width of wing. Hind wing 17–18 x as long as wide, almost as long as forewing; blade slightly infumate distally; longest marginal cilia 4.1–4.3 x greatest wing width. Metasoma. Petiole about 2 x wider than long. Gaster longer than mesosoma; ovipositor with a very large basal loop, up to 4/5 length of gaster, markedly exserted beyond apical gastral tergum (by 1/3 to 1/2 of ovipositor length, depending on the size and configuration of its basal loop: the shorter the latter is, the more the ovipositor is exserted), and about 2.5 x length of metatibia. Measurements of holotype (in µm). Gaster 677; ovipositor 750. Antenna: scape (including radicle) 182; pedicel 55; F1 28; F2 43; F3 55; F4 61; F5 89; F6 87; clava 173. Forewing 780:188; longest marginal cilia 248. Hind wing 769:42; longest marginal cilia 182. MALE. Unknown. Etymology. The specific name (a noun in apposition) is an arbitrary combination of letters. Diagnosis. Member of the clavatus species group. Erythmelus (E.) burtik differs from E. (E.) mudrila sp. n., to which it is most similar, primarily by the female antenna that has relatively long funicular segments (funicle length: clava length ratio 2.1–2.2:1), whereas in E. (E.) mudrila the funicular segments are relatively short (funicle length: clava length ratio about 1.7:1). Hosts. Unknown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.795
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1280.042

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomyFrench-language works237,207