MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912491195 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3857603

Acanthonotozomella trispinosa

2017· article· en· W6912491195 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCephalopods and Marine Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCruiseCapeNova scotiaConodont

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acanthonotozomella trispinosa (Bellan-Santini, 1972) Paracanthonotozoma trispinosum Bellan-Santini, 1972: 177, pl. 6. Acanthonotozomella trispinosa – Watling & Holman 1980: 610. — Watling & Thurston 1989: 310. — Coleman 2007: fig. 3a–j, map 1 (triangle). Material examined RV Polarstern cruises: SOUTHERN OCEAN: 1 spec., cruise PS77,ANT-XXVII/3, CAMBIO, stn 248-2, Larsen B, 65°57.51ʹ S, 60°28.15ʹ W to 65°57.69ʹ S, 60°28.30ʹ W, 196–202 m, Agassiz trawl, 7 Mar. 2011, coll. C. Havermans and H. Robert (RBINS, INV. 132673) [extraction E16 of 23 Aug. 2012; Genbank nr, 28S: KT808684, 18S: KT808770]. Distribution Adélie Coast: Cape Géodésie; Scotia Sea; eastern shelf of Weddell Sea; 120–130 m (De Broyer et al. 2007); Larsen B, 196–202 m (present material). Remarks Rauschert & Arntz (2015: 59, pl. 52) give a photograph of an Acanthonotozomella cf. trispinosa, which might be a species distinct from the true A. trispinosa. In the archives of RBINS, there is an annotated copy of this photograph. It indicates that the specimen is 6 mm long and was collected at the station 293 of ANT-XXI/2. The coordinates of stn 293-1 are 72°51.90ʹ S, 19°39.31ʹ W to 72°48.65ʹ S, 19°39.62ʹ W (eastern shelf of the Weddell Sea), 518– 542 m.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicCephalopods and Marine BiologyFrench-language works237,207