MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912495858 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3791019

Gyrophaena (Phaenogyra) gracilis Seevers 1951

2009· article· en· W6912495858 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
Canadian institutionsCanadian Forest ServiceNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAedeagusSpermathecaSetaDorsumSternumApex (geometry)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

29. Gyrophaena (Phaenogyra) gracilis Seevers Figs 1–3, 28, 184–191; Map 24 Gyrophaena (Phaenogyra) gracilis Seevers, 1951: 727; Moore and Legner 1975: 429. Description. Body length 1.3–1.5 mm, dark brown with light brown pronotum. Punctation: vertex of head, pronotum and elytra evenly punctate (Fig. 1). Microsculpture: reticulate throughout. Antennae light yellow-brown as illustrated (Fig. 1). Pronotum 1.2 times as wide as long. MALE: tergite 8 with two large lateral teeth, and two small teeth, apical margin slightly emarginate medially (Fig. 182); Map 24. Collection localities in New Brunswick, Canada of Gyrophaena gracilis 28. G. gracilis 29. E. corruscula 30. E. socia Figures 28–30. Gyrophaena and Eumicrota species in dorsal view (apical part of abdomen removed in Fig. 29): 28 G. (P.) gracilis Seevers 29 E. corruscula (Erichson) and 30 E. socia (Erichson). sternite 8 rounded apically (Fig. 183). Median lobe of aedeagus with elongate and apically divided tubus (Figs 184, 185), its base may be slightly swollen basally (Fig. 184), apical projection of internal sac short and irregularly shaped (Figs 184, 185). Paramere as illustrated (Fig. 186). FEMALE. Tergite 8 truncate apically (Fig. 190); sternite 8 broadly rounded apically and pointed medially (Fig. 191); spermatheca as illustrated (Fig. 189). Despite its distinctive external morphology, G. gracilis has genital structures very similar to those of G. meduxnekeagensis and G. subnitens (Figs 161–174). Bionomics. Macrohabitat: Silver maple swamp, flood plain forest, red oak forest. Microhabitat: on Trametes hirsuta (Wolfen) Pilat growing on Populus tremuloides log (two sites), partially dried Pleurotus sp. on dead standing trembling aspen (one specimen) and one specimen from nest contents of barred owl (Strix varia Barton) nest box with small chicks. Collecting period: May, June, and August. Collecting method: sifting mushrooms and aspirating specimens. Distribution (Map 24). CANADA: New Brunswick; UNITED STATES: Wisconsin. Comments. Gyrophaena gracilis is externally the most distinctive species of the genus. Unlike other Gyrophaena species it has an extremely elongate postocular temple area of the head with sides subparallel for most of its length (Fig. 1), a small, evenly punctate pronotum (Fig. 1) and a swollen abdomen (Figs 1, 2). Adults of this species occurred within the pores of the host mushrooms. The elon- gate body of this species would appear to be an adaptation allowing this species to enter the pores of its host.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.106

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicMarine Invertebrate Physiology and EcologyFrench-language works237,207