Pseudoholostrophus Nikitsky 1983
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<i>Pseudoholostrophus</i> Nikitsky, 1983 <i>Pseudoholostrophus</i> Nikitsky, 1983: 37.— Type species: <i>Hallomenus klapperichi</i> Pic, 1954 (orig. des.); Nikitsky, 1998: 40; Young and Pollock, 2002: 416. This genus was described by Nikitsky (1983) on the basis of examination of <i>Hallomenus klapperichi</i> Pic, which is now included in, and type species of <i>Pseudoholostrophus</i>. According to Nikitsky (1998), <i>Pseudoholostrophus</i> differs from <i>Holostrophus</i> in its smaller and more weakly emarginate eyes, and the prosternal process not extending behind the posterior edge of the procoxae. Th ere are four species in <i>Pseudoholostrophus</i> (Nikitsky, 1998), two of which are Nearctic (including Canada) in distribution. Th e other two species, <i>P</i>. <i>klapperichi</i> (Pic) and <i>P</i>. <i>chinensis</i> Nikitsky, are known from China. Nikitsky (1998) divided the genus into two subgenera; all species other than <i>P</i>. <i>discolor</i> (Horn) are placed in the nominate subgenus. <i>Holostrophus discolor</i> (Horn) was transferred to <i>Pseudoholostrophus</i> (<i>Holostrophinus</i>) by Nikitsky (1998).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".