Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phyllonorycter tritaenianella (Chambers, 1871) (Figs. 71–73) L.[ithocolletis] tri-taenianella Chambers 1871b: 110. Phyllonorycter tritaenianella (Chambers) — Davis 1983: 10. Leaf mine. An upper-surface blotch; initially flat and white, speckled with brown (Fig. 71), later becoming tentiform and causing the leaf to fold over completely (Fig. 73) (Braun 1908). Host. Betulaceae: Ostrya virginiana (Mill.) K. Koch. Distribution. Canada: ON, QC; USA: CT, IL, KY, MA, MI, NH, NJ, NY, OH. Review. Chambers (1871b) described this species from an adult caught in Kentucky. Chambers (1873) reported rearing it from an upper-surface mine on Ostrya, and Chambers (1874a) synonymized with this species Lithocolletis consimilella Frey & Boll, which had been described from Massachusetts (Hagen 1884). Phyllonorycter tritaenianella has since been recorded from New Hampshire (Brower 1984), Illinois (Godfrey et al. 1987), Connecticut (Maier & Davis 1989), Michigan (Nielsen 1998), Ontario, and Quebec (Pohl et al. 2018). CSE has reared an adult from a leaf mine collected in New York (Taughannock Falls State Park, Tompkins Co.; Figs. 71–72), and mines have been found in Ohio (West Union, Adams Co.; CSE) and New Jersey (Sussex Co.; Rall 2019). Comments. Maier & Davis (1989) stated that P. tritaenianella has at least two generations per year, listing Connecticut specimens reared from mines collected on 26 July and from 28 September to 19 October. Adults have been caught as early as April in Kentucky (Chambers 1871b) and Illinois (Godfrey et al. 1987), but 6 July appears to be the earliest date a larval mine has been documented (in Concord, Middlesex Co., Massachusetts, by CSE; Fig. 73). Our New York specimen emerged after overwintering in a mine collected on 30 August; thus it appears unlikely that a third generation occurs in northern states.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".