MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912505976 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5189293

Iophon koltuni Morozov, Sabirov, & Zimina 2019

2019· article· en· W6912505976 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFirthTable (database)BayRemotely operated underwater vehicle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Iophon koltuni Morozov, Sabirov & Zimina, 2019 Figure 3, Table 3 Synonymy: Iophon piceus dubius Koltun, 1959: 151 –152, Fig. 107; pl. XXVI, fig. 2 Iophon cf. nigricans: Dinn & Leys, 2018: 33 Iophon koltuni Morozov, Sabirov & Zimina, 2019: 4 –7, fig. 3, 4 Material Examined. CMNI 2018-0180, specimen in 95% ethanol and frozen, collected by Curtis Dinn by Agassiz Trawl; 15 July 2017 141 m, depth, (63° 38.390’ N, 68° 37.642’ W). CMNI 2018-0166, specimen in 95% ethanol, collected by Philippe Archambault by ROV hydraulic manipulator; 25 October 2015, 96 m depth, (63° 38.332’N, 68° 37.7139’W). All operations performed from the CCGS Amundsen in Frobisher Bay near Hill Island. Comparative material examined. BELUM Mc3646 Iophon nigricans, August 16, 2006, 35.6 m depth, Annika’s pinnacle, Maidens (55° 0.5323 N, 5° 42.5858 W). BELUM Mc5341 Iophon nigricans, July 31, 2009, 20 m depth, Bola Reef, Abercastle, North Pembrokeshire (51° 58.322 N, 5° 18.104 W). BELUM Mc4296 Iophon nigricans, June 24, 2008, depth 29 m, NW of Cath Sgeir, Gigha, Firth of Lorn (55° 39.87 N, - 5° 47.69 W). External appearance (Figure 3A, C). The specimens consist of irregular finger-like growths that form large bushes 15–25 cm in height. Dense aggregations of the bushes were seen to occur in patches several meters in diameter. The fingers do not appear to attach to a broad base, but rather branch off a small central narrow stalk. The oscula are not obvious and are raised along the surface of the fingers, mostly near the base where neighbouring fingers join. The oscula collapse upon collection. The sponge grows in soft sediment attached to polychaete tubes and small rocks. The colour is pale yellow, with lighter almost white tips in situ, but becomes dark brown/grey on contact with air and after preservation in ethanol. The body surface is irregular and furrowed, with white distal portions that appear denser than the underlying body. A transparent membrane covers the lower portions but collapses after collection. The consistency is firm, with a soft surface texture that crumbles easily after freezing or preservation. Spicules (Figure 3 D–K). CMNI 2018-0180 has two types of megascleres: acanthostyles and tylotes. The acanthostyles are thin, some tylote, variably spined (Fig. 3D,E), often with long spines on the head (Fig. 3 E,G) are 277 (245–308) x 9.7 (8–12) µm. Rarely these spicules are very thin and elongate but are not abundant enough to be considered a second size category. Smooth ectosomal tylotes with swollen microspined heads (Fig. 3F,H) are 247 (199–266) x 7.6 (6–9) µm. Microscleres are spurred anisochelae (Fig. 3K,L) 19 (16.5–22) µm and large bipocilli with reduced, single, equal-sized alae and elongated teeth (Fig. 3. I,J) 15.4 (12.5–19.5) µm. The bipocilli are relatively large, and have long, smooth, arcuate shafts with a bend in the centre of the shaft. CMNI 2018-0166 was collected at 96 m depth and conforms to CMNI 2018-0180 in spicule complement and browning of the sponge in air and with preservation. Only small fragments of CMNI 2018-0166 were collected by ROV in 2015. Megascleres of CMNI 2018-0166 include acanthostyles 268 (232–295) x 7.6 (4–12) µm and tylotes 249 (219–277) x 6.7 (4.5–9) µm. Microscleres are anisochelae 29 (17.5–37) µm and bipocilli 18 (13.5–21) µm. Skeleton (Figure 3 B). Ectosomal tylotes are arranged tangentially at the surface. Acanthostyles are arranged in the choanosome in a very loose isodictyal reticulation forming triangular or square meshes of multispicular tracts. This reticulation can often appear confused in the choanosome. Bipocilli and spurred anisochelae are scattered throughout the tissues. 1 Ackers et al., 1992 and Van Soest et al., 2000 2 Goodwin, 2017 3 Lundbeck, 1905 4 Arndt, 1935 and Van Soest et al., 2000 Taxonomic Remarks. The specimens fit the spicule description of I. koltuni from the Laptev Sea, though the bipocilla spicules are larger in the Frobisher Bay specimens yet the form is consistent. The external morphology also differs from the described holotype. Specimens from Frobisher Bay grow in an elaborate digitate form while the original description by Morozov et al. (2019) describes a leaf-shaped fragment with poorly pronounced lobes. The specimens described here were initially thought to be Iophon nigricans (Bowerbank, 1858) briefly described by Dinn & Leys (2018) but the description of Iophon cf. nigricans by Dinn & Leys (2018) was subsequently synonymized with I. koltuni. As no images of the species were published with the original description of I. koltuni, and DNA material was not provided, this record serves to expand upon the original description. The WPD lists 38 species of Iophon, nine of which are found in the Atlantic. Iophon cheliferum Ridley & Dendy, 1886 was supposedly collected by Lambe (1896) in the Gulf of Saint Lawrence, but de Laubenfels (1949) suggested that the specimen was actually I. nigricans and Lévi (listed as a personal communication in Brunel et al. 1998) suggests that the specimens were actually I. piceum (Vosmaer, 1882) (Brunel 1998). Lambe (1900) also suggests that I. cheliferum occurs off Vancouver, British Columbia. The type specimen of I. cheliferum is from the Cape of Good Hope, South Africa, and so it is unknown if I. cheliferum does in fact occur in eastern Canada; therefore, it is not discussed here. There are three other species of Iophon known from the northwest Atlantic: I. dubium Koltun, 1955 which has been recorded from the Arctic Ocean, Barents Sea and the western Greenland shelf, I. nigricans, recorded from European waters and eastern Canada, and I. piceum (Vosmaer, 1882), which has been recorded from the western Greenland shelf, Arctic Ocean, Barents Sea, Iceland, the eastern Canadian Arctic, and the White Sea. Most Atlantic Iophon species have bipocilli of a common form where one ala is round, and the other is more elongate and saucershaped with more numerous teeth. This is true for all except I. dogieli in which, in the original description, the bipocilli are more variable in shape. Iophon koltuni specimens from Frobisher Bay are notable because of the bushlike growth form, and the browning of the tissue when exposed to air, much like I. nigricans which turns black. The thin acanthostyles with large spines on the head and the large bipocilli with equally sized single alae are also distinctive. Iophon koltuni is distinguished from the Atlantic species in the following ways (Table 3): Iophon dogieli Koltun, 1955 (Iceland): Megascleres are smooth styles (not acanthostyles) and smooth, short, and thick styles with a microspined head (not tylotes). These small styles appear to be inequiended tornotes in Koltun’s description. Bipocilli are a similar length and shape, however of the three bipocilli variations in Koltun’s description, the irregular three-lobed type with clover-shaped ala was not found in these specimens. The anisochelae are also slightly smaller than in the Frobisher Bay specimens (Koltun 1955). Iophon dubium (Hansen, 1885) (Arctic, western Greenland): The bipocilli are much smaller and have unequal alae. This species does not turn dark in air. (Lundbeck 1905). Iophon frigidum Lundbeck, 1905 (Barents Sea): This sponge lacks bipocilli. Acanthostyles are longer, tylotes are larger, and anisochelae are larger (Lundbeck 1905). Iophon hyndmani (Bowerbank, 1858) (Europe): This species has a second category of smaller entirely spined acanthostyles and the bipocilli are smaller and have unequal alae (Ackers et al. 1985). Iophon nigricans (Bowerbank, 1858) (Europe): Megascleres are shorter. This species also has two categories of anisochelae and very small bipocilli with unequal alae (Ackers et al. 1992, Van Soest et al. 2000). Iophon piceum (Vosmaer, 1882) (Arctic): The acanthostyles are much longer and thicker than in the Frobisher Bay specimens, tylotes are longer and the bipocilli are smaller and have unequal alae with fine teeth (Arndt 1935, Van Soest et al. 2000). Iophon pommeraniae Thiele, 1903 (Norway): The acanthostyles are longer than in the Frobisher Bay specimens, tylotes are longer, and the bipocilli are smaller and have unequal alae (Thiele 1903). Iophon spinulentum (Bowerbank, 1866) (Europe): The acanthostyles are smaller and the bipocilli are much smaller and have unequal alae. Tylote length was not given in the source (Bowerbank 1866). Iophon variopocillatum Alander, 1942 (North Sea): The acanthostyles are shorter, the tylotes are shorter and thinner, and there are two size categories of bipocilli with unequal alae (Alander 1942). Recently, an Iophon specimen not assigned to a species level was reported from the Bay of Fundy (Goodwin 2017). This sponge has slightly shorter acanthostyles 193 (193–284) x 9.9 (7.4–11.7) µm, shorter tylotes 187 (157– 244) x 5.9 (3.4–10.4) µm, small bipocilli with unequal alae are 7.9 (6.5–8.7) µm in length and this sponge has one size category of anisochelae that are 18 (14–22) µm in length. The Bay of Fundy specimen was reported to turn black in air, similar to I. nigricans. Therefore, the Frobisher Bay specimens are similar to the Bay of Fundy specimens, in that they only have one size category of anisochelae, though they are smaller in the Bay of Fundy specimen. The two differ, however, in the form of the bipocilli, where the Frobisher Bay specimens have much larger bipocilli with equal sized alae. In summary, most North Atlantic species of Iophon have bipocilli of the common form with unequal alae, except for I. dogieli, but that species has thick styles and smaller styles/tornotes rather than acanthostyles and tylotes as found in the present specimens. Iophon nigricans appears most similar in darkening upon exposing the specimen to air but does not have a bush-like growth form, has smaller megaslceres, has two size categories of anisochelae, and has very small bipocilli. Discussion. This sponge forms dense aggregations in inner Frobisher Bay. It grows among large stalked ascidians and other s

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicMarine Invertebrate Physiology and EcologyFrench-language works237,207