Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tribe Liparetrini Diagnosis (modified from Britton 1990). Antennae with 8-10 antennomeres, including a 3-7 antennomere club; body color testaceous, castaneous, or black (rarely bicolored), surface usually shining; elytral striae paired or approximately equally spaced; wings fully developed, folded, functional; mesosternal / metasternal process absent; metatibiae with 2 apical spurs, spurs set below and above the tarsal articulation (tarsus moves between tibial spurs); abdominal ventrites without a longitudinal ridge on each side; claws simple, without a tooth on the concave side; metatibiae with an interrupted or complete, obliquely transverse spinose ridge near the middle (sometimes absent). Remarks. The tribe Liparetrini is endemic to Australia and there is little merit to the previous placement New World taxa in this tribe by some authors (for a definition and detailed treatment of Liparetrini, see Britton [1980, 1990]). Accordingly, the genera Aplodema, Blepharotoma, and the New World species formerly placed in Heteronyx have all been transferred to the tribe Sericoidini (see above under the heading for Blepharotoma). Evans (2003) also listed the monotypic genus Zaburina Saylor (from Colombia) and the species Aplodema rufescens (Saylor) (from Guyana) in the tribe Liparetrini. These taxa are here removed from the tribe Liparetrini and placed in incertae sedis, pending a thorough examination of the type material. I will refrain from speculating on the proper classification of these taxa other than to say that their previous placement and possibly the distribution given are highly dubious. I examined the holotype of Zaburina columbiana Saylor a few years ago at the California Academy of Sciences and noted that it had a labrum projecting below clypeus, metatibial spurs on either side of tarsus, and propygidial suture evident. These characters suggest that this taxon might either belong in the tribe Sericini or could be a mislabeled Australian specimen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.042 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".