MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6912514075 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5013957

Oculudentavis Xing et al., 2020

2021· article· en· W6912514075 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuadrate boneGenusNomenclatureForamenTaxonCorrect nameConoidType species

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Genus Oculudentavis Xing et al. 1 Type species Oculudentavis khaungraae Xing et al. 1 Note: The retraction 8 of the original description of this taxon 1 does not affect the nomenclatural availability of Oculudentavis khaungraae under the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (chapters 3 and 4), as retraction of a paper by itself has no nomenclatural consequence. 9–11 Using O. khaungraae as an example, there have been recommendations that the code needs to be modified to cover names and nomenclatural acts contained in retracted papers and to include a rule that can be applied automatically without the necessity of submitting a case. 12 Nonetheless, at the present time, the current regulations stand. Diagnosis of the genus Oculudentavis Oculudentavis can be identified as a lizard by having a pleurodont dentition with posterolingual tooth replacement, a short quadrate with a lateral conch, a streptostylic quadrate suspension, a ‘‘hockey stick’’-shaped squamosal, a reduced quadrate-pterygoid contact, an enclosed vidian canal (posterior opening within the basisphenoid), a prootic with an alar process and a prominent crista prootica, and a braincase in which the metotic fissure is subdivided into a small ovoid lateral opening of the recessus scalae tympani and a posterior vagus foramen (differentiating it from archosaurs, where the metotic fissure becomes enclosed, following a totally different development). 13 The genus Oculudentavis can be diagnosed by the following apomorphic characters. Some of these characters are reworded here from the original diagnosis of O. khaungraae 1 and some from a subsequent paper, 3 which now includes characters that only apply to O. khaungraae: jugal expanded horizontally creating a wide ventral orbital flange; jugal bar cross-section strongly angled dorsolaterally-ventromedially; 1 22 to 23 teeth in maxilla, about four of which are located beneath the orbit; vomers contact both the premaxillary and maxillary shelves; large unpaired median premaxilla with a long dorsal crest along nasal process that is continued onto the dorsal surface of the nasals along most of its length; premaxilla replaces maxilla in anterolateral part of rostrum; ring-shaped lacrimal fully enclosing large lacrimal foramen; short vaulted parietals partially fused; and presence of a flat surface (forming a platform) on the dorsolabial side of the posterior third of the dentary. ll OPEN ACCESS (legend on next page) Oculudentavis differs from all other known lizards in possessing the following unique combination of characters: premaxilla forming exclusively the tip of the rostrum and the anterolateral border of the nares; elongated paired nasals that slot into a triangular frontal recess; no parietal foramen, supratemporal processes angled vertically downward; strongly triradiate postorbital with long squamosal process reaching posterior margin of parietal; very large suborbital fenestra; palatal dentition on the pterygoids—differing from the interpretation in Li et al., 3 which also reported teeth on the palatine, the presence of which we have been unable to confirm; in dentary, dorsal and ventral margins of the Meckelian fossa meet to close fossa, but do not fuse; and short postdentary region with coronoid bearing a low, posteriorly set process, short deep adductor fossa, and long slender retroarticular process. Oculudentavis further differs from all squamates except Huehuecuetzpalli in having a long tapering rostrum 3 composed of premaxilla, maxillae, and elongated paired nasals that slot into a triangular frontalrecess; from allsquamates except for Huehuecuetzpalli, varanids, lanthanotids, monstersaurs, and mosasaurs in theretractednarial openings, 3 although inallbut Huehuecuetzpalli a reduction of the nasals occurs; from all squamates except chameleons in having a prefrontal with an anterolateral shelf (‘‘boss’’ in Gauthier et al. 7) that overhangs maxilla and lacrimal; from all squamates except for the pygopodid Lialis in its very long slender mandible composed mainly of shallow elongate dentary and relatively short post-dentary portion; and from all squamates except for some anguimorphs in the presence of posterolingual tooth replacement. The closed (but not fused) Meckelian fossa is shared mainly with iguanians, differing from the open fossa of most anguimorphs, lacertoids, and scincoids and the closed and fused fossa of gekkotans, dibamids, gymnophthalmids, xantusiids, some scincids, and some iguanians. Thepremaxilla,maxilla,andnasalare notfusedinto asingle unit as was described in the original description of O. khaungraae. 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.106

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology→French-language works237,207→