Stigmatomyces ephydrae L. Mercier & R. Poiss.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stigmatomyces ephydrae L.Mercier & R.Poiss. MB#531320 Fig. 58D–F Bulletin de la Société Zoologique de France 52: 226 (Mercier & Poisson 1927). – Type: [Type lost?!] “Au cours de l’été dernier, chassant les Diptères dans les marais de Colleville-sur-Orne, en bordure de la côte du Calvados, nous avons capturé de nombreux exemplaires d’ Ephydra riparia Fall., Diptère extrêmement commun …”. [Mercier & Poisson 1927: 227, fig. 1] [France] Stigmatomyces bottnicus Huldén (Huldén 1983: 64) [MB#108563] Stigmatomyces setacerae Huldén (Huldén 1983: 68) [MB#108569] Diagnostic features Basal cell of appendage dark, slightly elongate, supporting a series of four superposed cells, each bearing one antheridium on the inner side, except for the upper cell which gives rise two antheridia, where the distal one bears a dorsal spinous process (Fig. 58D, sx). Perithecium with four rounded distal swellings and an abruptly distinguished, narrow, bent neck. [Detailed description: Thaxter 1931; Weir & Rossi 1995] Distribution and hosts Occurs on Diptera Ephydridae of the genera Ephydra Fallén, 1810, Setacera Cresson, 1930 and probably Glenanthe Haliday, 1839 (Rossi et al. 2013). Reported from France (type), Russia, Finland (Huldén 1983), Italy (Rossi 1993), United Kingdom (Weir & Rossi 1995), New Zealand (Hughes et al. 2004), Brazil (Bergonzo et al. 2004), China (Shen & Ye 2006), Canada, Kyrgyzstan, USA, and Portugal (Rossi et al. 2013). Collections examined from Denmark On Ephydra riparia Fallén, 1813 (Diptera Ephydridae) DENMARK – Nordøstsjaelland (NEZ) • Jersie Strand; 55°30.992′ N, 12°13.142′ E; UB25; 31 Aug. 2019; JP 1510; V. Michelsen det.; ZMUC C-F-124262. Remarks First record from Denmark. Its presence in Denmark is not surprising according to its records in neighbouring countries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".