Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genus Tectulipora Hall, 1888 TYPE SPECIES. — Fenestella (Hemitrypa) lata Hall, 1883, by subsequent designation (Hall 1888). Middle Devonian; Canada, Ontario. OCCURRENCE. — Lower to Upper Devonian of North America and Eurasia. DIAGNOSIS. — Reticulate colonies, conical or fan-shaped, planar or longitudinally pleated, frontal surface exterior if conical. Branches wide, moderately sinuous, closely or intermediately spaced, dichotomously divided. Two rows of autozooecia per branch. Straight to sinuous, high club-shaped median keel on obverse side of branch, composed of core of granular skeleton and sheath of laminar skeleton. Axial wall between autozooecial rows straight in tangential sections, continuing unbroken in superstructure; superstructure corresponding with underlying branches and dissepiments or with autozooecial apertures, consisting of laterally expanded laths borne on continuous skeletal sheets from branches and dissepiments. Autozooecia not strongly inflated laterally, commonly rectangular in deep tangential section; transverse walls at intermediate or high angle to reverse wall; hemisepta absent. Intermediate- to large-diameter short distal tube, opening frontally or slightly inclined laterally; apertural peristome present or absent; terminal diaphragms planar where present, with central boss in some species. Laminar extrazooecial skeleton traversed by small to moderate microstyles. COMPARISON Unitrypa Hall, 1885 differs from Loculipora Hall, 1885 in having less sinuous branches which are joined by dissepiments instead of anastomoses in Loculipora. Transverse connections in the superstructure of Unitrypa do not contact with dissepiments, whereas the superstructure in Loculipora is produced by extensions of both median keels and dissepiments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".