Bibliographic record
Abstract
Panthea reducta Anweiler, sp. n. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: B84ACB81-796A-43FD-89C9-BEFB55E0FFC4 Figs. 3, 47, 70 Type material. Holotype male – “Republica Dominicana: / Pedemales; P.N. Sierra de Bahoruco / Caseta 2; 18°12.24' N 71°31.11' W / 12 v 2004 el. 1790 m A Luz Murcurio / coll. D. Lawrie and C. Nuñez ”; HOLOTYPE / Panthea reducta / Anweiler” [red label]; deposited in CNC [for eventual return to Dominican Republic]. Paratypes – (4 ♁): Dominican Republic, same data as holotype, except 1 ♁, 11.vi.2004 [CNC – for eventual return to Dominican Republic]. Etymology. The name refers to the greatly reduced size and density of scales on the hindwing. Diagnosis. P. reducta can be recognized as a Panthea by the typical Panthea forewing pattern, and by structural characters including the reduced and apparently non- functional mouthparts and characteristic modified Panthea uncus. The glassy translucent hindwing is unique in Panthea. It is also the only Panthea known from the Caribbean. Females are unknown. Description. Head – male antenna bipectinate, pectinations about 2 × as long as width of antennal shaft; head and collar clothed in long dense white, lightgray, and brown-black hair-like scales. Thorax – with long dense white and black hair-like scales, tegulae crossed midway and along edge by poorly defined dark bands. Dorsal forewing – length 16-18 mm, (n=4), ground a mixture of white, gray-brown and black scales; basal line indicated by a small patches of black scales; antemedial line black, erratic, angled distad at anal vein; medial line broad, incomplete and poorly defined, most prominent as patches of black scales below cubital vein and at and below costa; postmedial line black, slightly erratic, angled outward below vein Cu2, defined by white scales bordering distal side; subterminal line parallel to postmedial line, starting at anal angle, almost obsolete and defined by white scales outlining distal border; fringe gray with bright white outer edge, checkered with white at veins. Dorsal hindwing – translucent, clothed in tiny hair-like black scales, some finely forked at the tip under magnification, mixed with sparse long dark hair, densest along inner margin; white scales confined to small area along upper and lower margin; fringe black, with white tips in some specimens, checkered at veins with white; wing membrane exposed by reduced scales, glassy, translucent, allowing the lettering on label below to be clearly discerned through wing. Abdomen – clothed in short stiff lead-gray and white hair-like scales. Male genitalia – (Fig. 47) valve simple, short and broad, approximately 2 × as long as wide; cucullus bluntly rounded; clasper well-developed, slightly flattened, rod-like with a blunt tip, about ½ as long as width of valve at midpoint; tegumen with pair of small subuncal lobes; uncus approximately 2 × as wide as high, resembling a duck’s beak; tapering gradually to a broad, blunt terminus; aedeagus short, thick, about 3 × as long as wide; inflated vesica bulbous, short, wide, shaped like a hammer head, armed with a single large sharp curved cornutus on dorsal side near base, oriented anteriorly; ductus seminalis exits near base of vesica on dorsal side. Distribution and biology. P. reducta has been collected at 1800 m elevation in a Hispaniolan pine (Pinus occidentalis Swartz) forest in Sierra de Bahoruco National Park in the Dominican Republic (Fig. 70). Hispaniolan pine is the presumed larval host.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".