MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912567153 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4094854

INTENSIVE RELATIVE TO REGULAR 80 YEARS BLOOD PRESSURE MANAGEMENT ADULT OR ELDER: SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE SECONDARY EXAMINATION FOR INTERFERENCE

2020· article· en· W6912567153 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDietary Effects on Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlood pressureSTRIDEMontreal Cognitive AssessmentCirculatory systemRandomized controlled trialKidney diseaseCoronary heart disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<strong><em>Aim:</em></strong><em> To assess the impact of concentrated systolic circulatory strain (SBP) control in more seasoned grown-ups with hypertension, thinking about intellectual and physical capacity. Members: Adults 80 years or more seasoned.</em> <strong><em>Methods:</em></strong><em> However, the diabetes-free participants (N = 1169) randomized to an SBP aim of less than 130 mm Hg (escalated therapy) compared with a target of less than 140 mm Hg (standard therapy). Our current research was conducted at Mayo Hospital, Lahore from March 2019 to February 2020. Coronary disease, death, improvements in kidney capacities, gentle intellectual impedance (MCI), likely dementia, and specific antagonistic prospects is predicted. Stride speed has been measured by a 4 m walking test and the cognitive assessment in Montreal has been used to measure intelligent measurement capacity.</em> <strong><em>Results:</em></strong><em> Intense treatment has resulted in marked reductions in coronary cases (danger [HR] = .66; 95% trust [CI] = .48 to.93; death (HR = .68; 95 % CI = .49 to.94)) and ICM (HR = .70; 95 % CI = .51–.96). There was notable correspondence (P &lt; .001) that members with higher MoCA scores had large advantages from critical evaluation with a combination with CVD and mortality (HR=.40; 95% CI=.28-.57) with no consistent benefits from lower MoCA scores members (HR=.33 = .95% CI=87-.04). There was also a large correspondence (HR=.001). There was no indication that medication outcomes were heterogeneous with respect to walking speed. In the stepping bunch with no party comparisons in the intensity of damaging drops, the paces of intensive kidney damage and decays of any kind were 32 percent increased in a measured glomerular filtration period.</em> <strong><em>Conclusion:</em></strong><em> In adults with a maturity of 80 years or more, severe SBP management decreases the danger of severe coronary occurrences, and of movement, with an increased chance of kidney changes. The coronary and death benefits of extreme SBP regulation do not apply to well-developed individuals with lower psychological performance trend.</em> <strong><em>Keywords: INTENSIVE BP, ADULT OR ELDER, </em></strong>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.666
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicDietary Effects on HealthFrench-language works237,207