MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6912571577 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3790286

Lasionycta subdita

2009· article· en· W6912571577 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDorsumAedeagusLobeCommissureOvipositor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lasionycta subdita species-group The L. subdita species-group contains three allopatric species characterized by the male digitus and female ductus bursae. Th e digitus is heavily sclerotized with a nearly perpendicular orientation to the valve and bears a flange-like ridge or pointed projection at the base. Th ose of other species-groups are less sclerotized, are oblique to the valve, and have a simple elongate shape. Th e uncus is dorsoventrally flattened and the tip is ovate. Th e vesica is 1.5× as long as the aedeagus, has a slightly expanded subbasal and mesial section, and is weakly twisted beyond a 90° subbasal dorsal and rightward bend. It bears 3–5 stout basal cornuti and a distal elongate patch of spines. The male antenna is bipectinate with T-shaped individual segments. Th e female has a dorsoventrally flattened ductus bursae with a unique sclerotized asymmetrical bulge toward the right near the corpus bursae. Th e ovipositor lobe is membranous and covered with hair-like setae. Th e appendix bursae arises from the dorsal corpus bursae and projects dorsally, 30° anteriorly, and leftward proximally, turning posteriorly before the apex.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics→French-language works237,207→