MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912571590 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5099334

Gonatocerus (Cosmocomoidea) flagellaris

2010· article· en· W6912571590 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMollusks and Parasites Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeParatypeType localityAltitude (triangle)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gonatocerus (Cosmocomoidea) flagellaris (Ogloblin, 1959) (Not included in the key) (Figs 297–299) Lymaenon flagellaris Ogloblin 1959b: 61 –62. Type locality: vicinity of [San Francisco de] Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador. Gonatocerus (Gonatocerus) flagellaris (Ogloblin): De Santis 1979: 365 (catalog). Gonatocerus flagellaris (Ogloblin): Yoshimoto 1990: 40 (list). Lymaenon flagellaris Ogloblin: Loiácono et al. 2005: 13 (type information). Type material examined. Holotype male [MLPA] on slide labeled: 1. “ 2000 m, Lymaenon flagellaris AO ♂ Quito, Ecuador. 25.x.1957 J. Först =N3= [all ip] – Typus –// [in India ink]”; 2. ‘3934/1”. The mounting medium on the original slide (Fig. 4) was so dark that the poorly preserved, fragmented specimen was hardly visible, so in the course of this study the holotype was remounted into Canada balsam under four coverslips, as follows: 1) head, with both scapes attached; 2) one forewing missing the very base, one complete and one incomplete hind wing (missing the basal half or so); 3) one antenna without scape; 4) fragmented body and some leg segments. The published collection dates of the holotype and the paratype (25.x.1956 and 26.xi.1956) do not entirely match the collection date on the holotype slide label. The published altitude of the collection locality was stated as 3000 m and that is probably correct, given the similar altitude of Quito (San Francisco de Quito), but it is indicated as 2000 m on the label of the holotype slide. The paratype (we assume it was a male although sex of the paratype was not mentioned in the original description), collected 26.xi. 1956 in San Mateo, Esmeraldas, Ecuador, is missing from MLPA and its whereabouts are unknown. Redescription. MALE (holotype). Body mostly dark brown; antenna mostly brown except scape light brown; legs mostly light brown except coxae, most of metafemur, and metatibia brown. Antenna (Fig. 297) with scape smooth, short, 2.2–2.3x as long as wide (including a very short radicle); pedicel very small, F1 wider than following flagellomeres, but F2 and F3 almost as wide as F1. Mesoscutum and scutellum smooth. Propodeum (Fig. 298) with well-developed, subparallel submedian carinae extending to its anterior margin, and lateral carinae, otherwise smooth. Forewing (Fig. 299) 3.1x as long as wide (Ogloblin 1959b); longest marginal seta about 0.25x maximum wing width; disc notably infumate throughout and with a brown band from stigmal vein to posterior margin of wing, bare behind submarginal vein; cubital row of setae complete, just a few setae between it and marginal and stigmal veins, remainder of disc setose. Hind wing about 16x as long as wide; disc slightly infumate throughout, with setae mostly along margins (a few setae present in the middle of disc just beyond venation); longest marginal seta about 1.9x maximum wing width. Measurements (µm) of the holotype. Mesosoma 492; petiole 55. Antenna: scape (including radicle) 84; pedicel 42; F1 85; F2 112; F3 106; F4 106; F5 97; F6 100; F7 94; F8 94; F9 100; F10 97; F11 112. Forewing width 347; longest marginal seta 88. Hind wing: 756:48; longest marginal seta 91. Diagnosis. Gonatocerus (Cosmocomoidea) flagellaris is a member of the ater subgroup of the ater species group. Females are unknown, but males are characterized by the following combination: propodeum (Fig. 298) with well-developed, subparallel submedian carinae extending to anterior margin and with lateral carinae, otherwise smooth; forewing disc notably infumate throughout and with a brown band from stigmal vein to posterior margin of the wing, the cubital row of setae complete, and with just a few setae between it and the marginal and stigmal veins (Fig. 299). A matching female from or near the type locality is needed for proper recognition of this species. Distribution. NEOTROPICAL: Ecuador. Hosts. Unknown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicMollusks and Parasites StudiesFrench-language works237,207