MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912575018 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4924218

Pterostichus barri Bousquet, new species

2006· article· en· W6912575018 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicColeoptera Taxonomy and Distribution
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeSubgenusParatypeTaxonomy (biology)Cape

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pterostichus barri Bousquet, new species Etymology. This species is named after Thomas C. Barr who first recognized the presence of an undescribed species in the subgenus Feronina (Barr 1969:80). Type Material. Holotype (#) labelled: ‘‘ 4 mi. w. Pennington Gap, U.S. 421, Lee Co., VA, June 21, 1965, R. Freitag-D. Larson / holotype Pterostichus barri Bousquet CNC No 23463.’’ The specimen is deposited in the Canadian National Collection of Insects. Paratypes from the following localities in the United States of America. VIRGINIA. 4 miles west Pennington Gap, Lee Co., 21. VI.1965, R. Freitag-D. Larson (1 $, CNC). Birchleaf [Dickenson Co.], 9. VII.1980, A. Larochelle (2#, 3$, CNC). WEST VIRGINIA. Cranberry Glades, 10 km west Mill Point, Pocahontas Co., 20. IV.1992, Acciavatti & Davidson (7#, 1$, CMNH). Cranberry Glades Botanical Area, southwestern corner, Pocahontas Co., 24.V.1981, 18.VII.1981, 1-2.V.1982, 8.V.1982, R. Davidson (9#, 2$, CMNH) [small streambanks]. 7.8 km east Elkins (780 m), Cheat District, Randolph Co., 4. V.1995, D. Koenig & M. Klingler (1#, CMNH) [oak forest]. 8.2 km northeast Richwood, Nicholas Co., 12. V.-6. VI.1986, A. Smetana (1$, CNC). Description. Habitus (Fig. 1). COLORATION. Body uniformly reddish-brown dorsally, though head slightly darker than pronotum and elytra in most specimens seen. Antennomeres 1–4 or 1–5 reddish-brown, remaining antennomeres paler, more or less reddish. Palpi pale reddish. Legs reddish-brown with tarsi somewhat paler. MICROSCULPTURE. Vertex with isodiametric meshes, meshes moderately impressed, less so near centre. Pronotum with slightly transverse meshes, meshes moderately impressed, less so in some specimens on disc; sculpticells flat. Elytra with linear microsculpture. HEAD. Frontal furrows superficial. Eye rather small, only slightly more prominent than temple. Temple long. Labial pits on mentum distinct. PRONOTUM. Side reflexed, particularly near posterior angle, and moderately sinuate in posterior half. Posterior angle right; anterior angle slightly projected anteriad. Lateral bead distinct, except near anterior angle, not widening posteriorly; basal bead distinct only between posterior setigerous puncture and impression. Lateral depression shallow, narrow over entire length. Base without punctures, with only one impression on each side; impression linear, long; area between impression and lateral depression slightly convex, not cariniform. ELYTRA. Striae well impressed up to apex, impunctate; parascutellar stria absent in most specimens, superficial and very short, more or less broken in some specimens. Parascutellar seta present. Intervals slightly convex. Interval 3 with three, exceptionally four, discal setae; anterior seta adjoining stria 3, median and posterior setae close to or adjoining stria 2. Humeral tooth not protruding. THORAX (VENTRAL SCLERITES). Prosternum smooth. Proepisternum with few, relatively small punctures anteromedially. Metasternum with few, relatively small punctures laterally. Metepisternum with anterior and medial edges subequal in length. ABDOMEN. Sterna without punctures laterally. Last visible sternum of male with small, median protuberance. LEGS. Protibia with two clip setae. Mesofemur with two posterior setae on ventral side. Metatrochanter with seta. Tarsomere 5 of each leg without setae on ventral side. GENITALIA. Median lobe of aedeagus and right paramere as illustrated (Fig. 2). Apparent body length: 9.2–10.9 mm. Geographical Distribution. This species lives in the Appalachian Mountains and is currently known from northeastern Kentucky (Barr 1969:80), eastern and central West Virginia and southwestern Virginia. Habitat. Barr (1969:80) wrote that adults of this species are found in caves, ravines, and mountains. André Larochelle (pers. comm.) caught several specimens under deep rocks along mountain brooks, on steep, well-drained ground. Dispersal Power. The hindwings are reduced to stubs and not functional. Remarks. Adults of Pterostichus barri can be distinguished from those of all other Pterostichus (sensu Bousquet 1999) living in eastern North America, except P. (Paraferonia) lubricus LeConte, by the combination of the following character states: side of pronotum sinuate in posterior half; elytral interval 3 with three discal setae; metatrochanter with seta; metepisternum subquadrate; tarsomere 5 without setae 160 ventrally. Members of P. barri differ from those of P. lubricus in having the elytral striae more impressed, particularly the lateral ones, the last visible sternum of the male with a small, median protuberance, the median lobe rounded between the basal bulb and the shaft, and the right paramere elongate apically. In P. lubricus, the last visible abdominal sternum has a much more prominent protuberance medially, the median lobe is angulate between the basal bulb and the shaft (Fig. 4a), and the right paramere is short apically (Fig. 4b). Pterostichus palmi Schaeffer, the second species of the subgenus Feronina, differs from P. barri in having the sides of the pronotum less deeply sinuate in basal half on average and not reflexed or almost so, only two discal setae on the elytral interval 3, no median protuberance on the last visible sternum of the male, and the median lobe of the aedeagus is more slender (Fig. 3a), with the apical lamella clearly longer (Fig. 3c). The body is also slightly more convex than in P. barri. 162

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicColeoptera Taxonomy and DistributionFrench-language works237,207