MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6912581077 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5658835

Cremnops cameronii Dalla Torre

2015· article· en· W6912581077 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmphibian and Reptile Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFemurSulcusTibiaScutellumApex (geometry)Clearance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cremnops cameronii (Dalla Torre) [Plate 6, Figs A–I] Agathis cameronii Dalla Torre, 1898. Female. Agathis tibialis Cameron, 1887. Female. Diagnosis. This species is distinguished from most other species by two distal hind tibial spines, non-prominent scutal flange, and a distribution from the Isthmus of Tehuantepec south to Argentina. Description. Holotype: female. Body length 6.5 mm (6.0–7.0 mm). Head (Figs C & F). Antennae broken on type specimen, 32–37 flagellomeres. Lateral carina of frons weak, ending significantly anteriad (to immediately anteriad) lateral ocellus. Interocellar space not elevated, level with lateral ocelli. Malar space 0.8x (0.6–1.1x) eye height. Mesosoma (Figs D, E & H). Subpronopes adjacent, separated by a partition wider than (or about to equal) the longitudinal length of the dorsomedial portion of pronotum. Median mesonotal lobe weakly depressed medially (to not depressed). Notaulus smooth (to foveolate). Scutellar sulcus with 1 (1–3) longitudinal carina. Hind margin of posterolateral scutal flange not prominent; rather: 90° to obtuse (to reduced and blunt). Mesoscutellar trough without (to with) longitudinal carinae laterally. Metanotal trough without extensive longitudinal carinae laterally. Sternaulus with 4 (3–5) pits; about 1/ 2x (1/3–1/ 2x) length of mesopleuron. Discrimen smooth. Medial propodeal areola with 3 (3–4) transverse carinae. Metapleuron rugose on ventral 1/4. Hind leg (Fig. I). Femur length about 3x width. Trochantellar carina absent. Distal tibia with 2 (or 3) spines. Inner tooth of inner and outer claws symmetrical, broad, angled quadrangular-shaped. Fore wing (Fig. G). Hyaline with melanic tint (to melanic). Metasoma (Figs A & B). 1st median tergite length about 2x apical width, apical width about 1.5x basal width. Body Color Red-orange, except black as follows: vertex, parts of face, ventral part of mesosoma, fore- and mid- leg, hind trochanter, trochantellus, distal tibia and tarsus (to all red-orange, black hind leg; orange instead of red-orange). Biology. Host —Unknown. Adults Collected —February to October. Geographic Range —The Isthmus of Tehuantepec and south to Argentina. See map in Appendix II. Comments. Cremnops cameronii is difficult to distinguish from C. meabilis. Cremnops cameronii has symmetrical inner and outer hind claw inner teeth (98% of specimens) (compared to asymmetrical or symmetrical in C. meabilis) and the hind angle of the scutal flange is not prominent varying from 90° to obtuse to reduced and blunt, whereas the hind claw inner teeth of C. meabilis is variable and the non-prominent scutal flange is generally 90° to obtuse (95% of specimens). Cremnops cameronii has a Neotropical distribution, from the Isthmus of Tehuantepec south to Argentina, whereas C. meabilis has a Nearctic distribution from the Isthmus of Tehuantepec north to Canada. Correct species identifications of specimens collected near the Isthmus of Tehuantepec should be confirmed by molecular (COI) analyses when possible. Material examined. HOLOTYPE: female, Presidios, Mexico, B.M. Type Hym. 3:936, (BMNH) (H8911). Non-Types: 37 (ESSIG), 18 (CAS), 37 (CNC), 26 (MNHN), 16 (MCZ), 42 (FSCA), 3 (UCDC), 18 (HIC). For holotype and additional images see Appendix VIII.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicAmphibian and Reptile Biology→French-language works237,207→