MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912582531 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5684787

Autogneta amnica Jacot 1938

2015· article· en· W6912582531 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBryophyte Studies and Records
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaRidgeTrunkHead (geology)HolotypeDorsum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Autogneta amnica Jacot, 1938 Figs 1–9 Autogneta longilamellata amicus Jacot, 1938, p. 11 Autogneta amica Jacot, 1938, Banks (1947, p. 122) Material Examined. Cotypes: USA, North Carolina, Buncombe Co., Poplar Cove, Bent Creek Experimental Forest, 35.488°N, 82.624°W; 1.vii. 1935 (A. P. Jacot), 25 specimens (21 females and 4 males) from fern litter, on slide 35F5.3–9 (USNM); same data, but 35F6.3–9 (not labelled cotype), 1 female (RAN). New York, Cortland Co., Heiberg Memorial Forest, 43.035°N, 76.135°W, 15.v.1971 (R. A. Norton) 1 female from humified log in hardwood forest; Alabama, De Kalb Co., De Soto State Park, Rhododendron Trail, 34.501°N, 85.618°W, 27.ix.1992 (V. Behan-Pelletier) 2 females, 2 males from moss at base of hemlock; Virginia, Blue Ridge Parkway, Washington National Forest, Wintergreen Trail, 37.930°N, 78.952°W, 1.x.1992 (V. Behan-Pelletier) 1 female, 1 male from in and under decaying tree trunk in oak-hemlock forest. Canada, Ontario, Eganville, Shaw Woods Nature Preserve, 45.667°N, 77.267°W. 20.v.1993 (B. Eamer) 2 males from second-growth forest. Diagnosis. Adult. Apophyses posteriorly on prodorsum expressed as 1 pair of narrow, discrete ridges. Circular cluster of tubercles anterolateral of lamellar seta. Bothridial seta 44–51, with fusiform head about 21, head with minute spicules, except 1 longer spicule distally. Cluster of tubercles posterior of acetabulum IV. Genital setae 6 pairs. Leg segments without tubercles. Femur I without tubercles on proximal third of leg. Genua I and II with seta v’ present. Notogastral setae c and l series thin, very weakly barbed, acuminate, 16–19 long, with c shortest seta. Sexually dimorphic, with males having oblong porose area posteromedially between lyrifissures ips, setal pair h1 inserted within porose area. Seta h1 longer (24–31) than in female and thick, heavily barbed, acuminate. Pair h1 more closely adjacent in male, mutual distance h1–h 1 8–12; in female h1–h 1 27–31. Description. Adults. Dimensions: Total length: cotype females (n = 9) 280 (259–288); females (Virginia) (n = 2) 293 (293, 293); cotype males (n = 3) 255 (243–273); males (Virginia) (n = 1) 283. Notogastral length: females (n = 2) 197 (192, 202). Integument: Generally microtuberculate. Pleural region strongly tuberculate from dorsal of acetabulum II to acetabulum III (Fig. 4). Circular cluster of tubercles lateral of lamellar seta (Fig. 7, white arrow). Cluster of tubercles posterior of acetabulum IV (Fig. 6, arrow). Leg segments without tubercles; ridges present antiaxially on femur IV. Margin of epimere 4 without concave depressions medially (Fig. 6). Prodorsum: Rostral incision about 15. Costula 66–86, medial and lateral edges roughened; bearing seta le anteriorly, about 27 long, acuminate, barbed (Figs 1, 4, 7); longitudinal ridge and tubercles absent lateral of costula; transverse ridge present associated with anterior tubercle of enantiophysis E (Fig. 7, black arrow). Enantiophysis E well developed lateral to proximal third of costula (Figs 1, 7). Region lateral of lamellar seta smooth, defined by transverse ridge of enantiophysis E posteriorly and anterolateral circle of tubercles anteriorly (Figs 4, 7, arrows). Apophyses posteriorly on prodorsum expressed as 1 pair of narrow, discrete ridges (Figs 1, 4, 5). Rostral, lamellar, interlamellar and exobothridial setae thin, weakly barbed, acuminate; ro 19–27, le 22–27, in 12–18, ex about 17. Mutual distance ro–ro about 15, le–le 17–21, in–in about 26. Humeral apophysis weakly developed (Figs 1, 4). Bothridial seta 44–51, with fusiform head about 21, head with minute spicules, except 1 longer spicule distally (Figs 4, 5). Notogaster: With U-shaped furrow clearly evident (Fig. 1). In female, notogastral setae thin, very weakly barbed, acuminate, 16–19 long, with c shortest seta, positioned as in Fig. 1; mutual distance h1–h 1 27–31, that of p1– p 1 26–37. Males with oblong porose area posteromedially positioned between lyrifissures ips, 27 wide x 19, and bearing seta h1 (Figs 8, 9, arrows). Notogastral setae of males similar to those of female, except h1 setae longer than in female, 24–31 and thick, heavily barbed, acuminate (Figs 3, 8, 9); mutual distance h1–h 1 8–12, p1–p 1 27–31. Ventral Region: Epimeral setae 11–19 long, tapered, slightly roughened, with seta 3b longest. Genital setae 6 pairs, about 8 long, acuminate, smooth, positioned as in Figs 2, 6; aggenital and anal setae 12–15 long, smooth, acuminate. Adanal setae weakly barbed, 12–23. Gnathosoma: As for genus. Legs: Setation (Table 1): leg I: 1-5-3(1)-4(2)-18(2); leg II: 1-5-2(1)-4(1)-15(2); leg III: 2-3-1(1)-3(1)-15; leg IV: 1-2-2-3(1)-12. Femur I without antiaxial or dorsal tubercles in proximal third. Seta v ’ present on genua I and II. Immatures: Unknown. Remarks. This species was described as a subspecies of Autogneta longilamellata by Jacot 1938. Banks (1947) redescribed the species and considered it a distinct species; as did Marshall et al. (1987) and Subías (2004, 2014). Sexual dimorphism in this species is clearly distinct from that in A. longilamellata (see below). Both males and females of this species are easily recognized by the circular patch of tubercles anterolaterally on the prodorsum, and the pair of narrow, discrete ridges posteriorly on the prodorsum. Sexual dimorphism in this species is expressed as males with an oblong porose area posteromedially positioned between lyrifissures ips, which is absent in the female and setae h1 longer in the male than in the female, and thick, heavily barbed, and acuminate. Gravid females carry up to 2 large eggs. Gut contents are primarily darkly pigmented fungi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.758
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicBryophyte Studies and RecordsFrench-language works237,207