Lecadonileia parvistyla BLAGODEROV & GRIMALDI 2004, new species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lecadonileia parvistyla, new species Figures 65–68, Plate 6E DIAGNOSIS: As for genus. DESCRIPTION: Body length = 2.24 mm, wing length = 2.05 mm. Head: Vertex setose. Ocelli three, lateral one twice its diameter from eye margin. Frons bare, face with tiny trichia. Scape small, roundish. Pedicel rounded, with dorsal setae, wider than flagellomeres. Flagellum 14segmented, cylindrical, flagellomere length equal to width. Palpi 4segmented. Basal palpomere very short, apical three subequal, lengths 2.5–3Χ their width. Clypeus setose. Thorax: Scutum irregularly setose. Antepronotum with 4 setae, proepisternum with 5. Ventral process of proepimeron just opposite anapleural suture. Anepisternum with distinct oblique cleft. Anepimeron very narrow ventrally. Laterotergites setose. Mediotergite bare. Wing membrane with macrotrichia. Costa ends beyond tip of R 5, at onefourth length between tips of R 5 and M 1. R 1 and R 5 with two rows of setae; R stem, rm, M 1, M 2, M 3+4, and CuA with one row. Sc ends free at the level of the base of M3 section. R 1 equal to M3 section and 2.5Χ length of rm. Fork of M 1 and M 2 1.8Χ length of M3. M 3+4 base absent, vein begins at level of RS base. Legs: Fore coxae with numerous setae on anterior and lateral surfaces. Mid coxae with setae on apical half. Hind coxae with posterolateral row of setae. Tibial bristles short. Fore tibiae with 3 apical bristles; mid one with 2 anterior and 6 apical bristles; hind tibia with 4–6 bristles in anterior, anteroventral, and anterodorsal rows and several apical bristles. Anteroapical depression on fore tibiae well developed, with single row of short setae. Tarsal claws without teeth. Abdomen setose. Eighth and 9th segments very short and retracted. Gonocoxites semicylindrical, widely separated at base. Gonostyli small, with one apical appendage turned medially. MATERIAL: Holotype MCZC 6941, male. Canada: Manitoba, Cedar Lake, coll. F.M. Carpenter. ETYMOLOGY: The species epithet is a combination of the Latin word parvus, meaning ‘‘small’’, and stylus, meaning ‘‘spike, stem, pen’’, in reference to simple small gonostyli of the species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".