Bibliographic record
Abstract
Eusceptis Hübner, [1823] Figs 15, 35, 45 This genus includes 11 species, mainly of the Neotropical Region, but one species extends northward to Texas. Th e relatively large moths (forewing length 9–17 mm) with their broad boldly-patterned forewings, are more reminiscent of some species of Eulepidotis Hübner than an acontiine. One species (E. obscura) is drably colored with more rounded wings, but the genitalia are typical for Eusceptis. Male genitalia (Fig. 35). The rows of stiff setae on the ventral surface of the uncus are diagnostic for the genus. The valves are broad and apically rounded, widest near the apex; they are highly asymmetrical in almost all species (less so in E. irretita) and in most the right valve is more structurally complex than the left one. In all species except two the corona is concentrated in a small cluster at the dorsal-apical corner of the valve at the apex of a rod-like thickening of the costal margin of the valve. Female genitalia (Fig. 45). These are similar to those of Acontia. The ostial area is sclerotized but the ductus bursae and corpus bursae are elongated and membranous; the appendix bursae is on a short membranous lobe on the left posterior margin of the corpus bursae. Th e apophyses and abdominal segment eight are very long and suggest a different mode of oviposition than other acontiines. Food plant. Malvaviscus arboreus Cav. (Malvaceae); reared by D. Janzen and W. Hallwachs in Costa Rica.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".