MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912590633 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4580571

Jassa laurieae Conlan & Desiderato & Beermann 2021, n. sp.

2021· article· en· W6912590633 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaAntenna (radio)CadaverMargin (machine learning)Dorsum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Jassalaurieae n. sp. (Table 11, Figs 54, 55) Diagnosis. Male: Mandibular palp: article 2, dorsal margin without a fringe of setae. Maxilla 1: without a seta or setal cluster at the base of the palp article 1. Gnathopod 1: basis, anterolateral margin with a few minute setae along its length; carpus without a single or cluster of short setae at the anterodistal junction of the propodus. Gnathopod 2: basis without a row of long setae along the anterolateral margin (setae minute, << basis width); carpus and propodus, setae on the anterior margin minute (setal length << basis width). Pereopods 5–7: missing. Uropods: missing. Telson: missing. Thumbed male: Antenna 2: large individuals with plumose setae on the flagellum and peduncular article 5. Gnathopod 2: propodus, palmar defining spines not produced on a ledge, absent in large thumbed males (state for small thumbed males unknown). Minor males unknown. Major males, thumb distally rounded and on the proximal half of the propodus. Dactyl expanded close to the junction with the propodus but not centrally toothed. Adult female: Unknown. Description. Male, holotype. Length ~ 4.7 mm. Antenna 1: each article with long filter setae on the posterior margin; accessory flagellum 2 articles, the second minute; flagellum 4 articles, each bearing aesthetascs. Antenna 2: stouter than antenna 1 and overlapped by antenna 1 to 2/3 the length of article 5; distal part of article 4 and full length of article 5 and flagellum bearing plumose setae on the posterior margin in addition to filter setae which are about the same length; flagellum 4 articles, article 1, 50% of flagellum length, article 4, 40% as long as article 3, flagellum articles 2–4 bearing curved spines posterodistally. Mandible: palp articles 2 and 3 without dorsal fringe of setae; raker spines 1 right, 4 left. Maxilla 1: inner plate bearing a few short, fine setae; palp without setae at the base of article 1; article 2 with 1 row of facial setae. Gnathopod 1: coxa produced forward, coxal margins, anterior 175% of dorsal length, ventral margin straight; basis flanged anteriorly, anterior margin without a fringe of long setae (all setae minute), posterior margin without setae; carpus, posterior lobe 45% of anterior margin length, without an anterodistal setal cluster; propodus, palm convex, defined by 3 spines (medial-lateral-medial), these mid-distant along the palm; dactyl facially striated. Gnathopod 2: coxa rounded, coxal margins, anterior 26% and posterior 38% of ventral length, ventral margin convex; gill present; carpus, posterior lobe with a cluster of setae; propodus, anterior margin with only a few minute setae proximally (setae << the width of the basis), palm with a few plumose setae at the dactyl hinge, defined by a long, straight thumb that is rounded at the tip, without palmar defining spines, thumb length 35% of propodus length. Pereopod 3: coxa deepest posteriorly; basis, margins convex; merus, setae 1/2 article width, article width maximally 65% of length; carpus nearly 100% overlapped by the merus; propodus not posteriorly spinose. Pereopod 4: coxa nearly rectangular, deeper than wide, ventrally convex; other articles as for pereopod 3. Pereopods 5–6: missing. Pereopod 7: coxa-ischium missing, distal articles slender, propodus not distally expanded, with small spines only anterodistally at the junction of the dactyl; dactyl, posterior (outer) margin not cusped distally, anterior (inner) margin bearing a seta only at the unguis. Pleopods: missing. Uropods: missing. Telson: missing. Condition. Mouthparts, right antennae 1 and 2, gnathopod 1, left gnathopod 2, and right pereopods 3 and 4 slide mounted. Whole body with left antenna 2 and gnathopod 1, right gnathopod 2 (coxa to merus) and left pereopod 4 in 70% ethanol. Missing posterior portion of the body from pereon segment 4 onwards, which had been removed for CO1 analysis. Variation. Maximum body length: male ~ 4.8 mm. Type material examined. Holotype, male, ~ 4.7 mm, from macroalgae at Praia Norte, Viana do Castelo, Portugal (41.6938, -8.85118), Pedro Gomes, collector, 23 September 2010, Specimen ID SFC 29-003, Process ID FCCOM341- 11. Donated by Filipe Costa, University of Minho, Portugal, to the Canadian Museum of Nature (CMN A2019.0061, catalogue no. CMNC 2019-1385). Paratype, male, ~ 4.8 mm, same location, date and collector, Specimen ID SFC 29- 002, Process ID FCCOM340-11 (catalogue no. CMNC 2019-1386). Etymology. Named in honour of artist Susan Laurie-Bourque who skillfully illustrated all the plates for this paper, Conlan (1990; in press), and many earlier taxonomic treatments. Remarks. Jassa laurieae is only known from the holotype and paratype specimens which are both major form adult males. Both specimens had the posterior portions of their body removed for CO1 analysis, with the results published in Lobo et al. (2017). Body length has been estimated based on the expected length of the remaining body using J. kimi as a model, which is similarly sized. The actual body portion available for study was 1.8 mm long for the holotype and 1.2 mm long for the paratype. Lobo et al. (2017) considered J. laurieae to be a Portuguese variant of J. pusilla, but the CO1 analyses revealed that both the holotype and paratype were genetically similar and clearly distinct from North Sea specimens of J. pusilla as well as from Portuguese and North Sea J. falcata, J. herdmani and J. marmorata, and from U.S. J. staudei. Jassa laurieae is only known from the Atlantic coast of Portugal, where it may be found with J. falcata, J. pusilla and J. herdmani (Fig. 9). Morphologically, the major form males of J. laurieae and J. falcata are similar in appearance at the anterior end, with plumose setae on antenna 2, minute setae on the anterior bases of gnathopods 1 and 2, absence of a seta or cluster of setae on the anterodistal margin of the gnathopod 1 carpus at the junction of the propodus, and relatively long thumb with rounded tip. The two differ in that J. laurieae lacks the dorsal fringe of setae on article 2 of the mandibular palp which both J. falcata and J. herdmani consistently possess in both sexes and all ages. Jassa falcata is also distinctive in having 1–2 spines midway along the inner ramus of uropod 3, but the state for J. laurieae is unknown. Large major form J. falcata have a very long thumb which is more squared at the tip than in J. laurieae but there are too few specimens of the latter to determine variation. Jassa laurieae is less similar in appearance to congener J. pusilla than to J. falcata in the major form male, although the females and juveniles may prove to be more similar. Major form males of J. pusilla develop an indent at the tip of the thumb and never have plumose setae on the antenna 2. Both species are similar in lacking the dorsal setal cluster on article 2 of the mandibular palp and lack of a seta or setal cluster on the anterodistal junction of the carpus with the propodus on gnathopod 1. They are also similar in their small body length, while J. falcata achieves a greater length. Until more specimens of J. laurieae are found, these two species are currently only distinguishable by the major form male. Additional distinguishing characters may occur on the posterior region of the body, though. Jassa herdmani bears the distinguishing setal fringe on article 2 of the mandibular palp (any age, both sexes), and this serves to easily separate it from J. laurieae. Major form males of J. herdmani do not bear plumose setae on antenna 2 and achieve greater body size.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.149 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomyFrench-language works237,207