MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912595625 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6122762

Brachygluta Thomson 1859

2015· article· en· W6912595625 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicColeoptera Taxonomy and Distribution
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaNearctic ecozoneFrench hornGenusTaxonomy (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Brachygluta Thomson, 1859 Bryaxis (of authors, not North American; not Leach, 1817 nor Kugelann, 1794). Brendel 1865a: 29; 1866a: 33; 1866b: 194 (discussion of female characters of 7 species); 1888a: 300; 1888b: 261. Brendel & Wickham 1890: 225, 267 (key). LeConte 1861: 57; 1863: 21; 1880: 181 (key). LeConte & Horn 1883: 88. Blatchley 1910: 318 (key). Bryaxis (Bryaxis): Brendel & Wickham 1890: 267. Brachygluta Thomson, 1859: 54. Type-species: Pselaphus fossulatus Reichenbach (orig. design.). Casey 1886: 182; 1908: 259. Raffray 1904: 218; 1908: 196, 228; 1911: 90. Leng 1920: 130. Bowman 1934: 77, 82 (key to groups and species). Park 1953: 307, 314. Arnett 1963: 317, 322. Newton & Chandler 1989: 42. Chandler 1990: 1184; 1997: 54; 2000: 293, 350; 2002: 53, 68, 87. Davies 1991: 128. Downie & Arnett 1996: 580 (key). Poole & Gentili 1996: 380. Bousquet et al. 2013 (checklist for Canada). Nisa Casey, 1886: 182. Type-species: Bryaxis cavicornis Brendel (design. by Newton and Chandler 1989). Raffray 1904: 218 (synonymy). Reichenbachia (Brachygluta): Ganglbauer 1895: 807. Bryaxis (Nisa): Brendel & Wickham 1890: 267 (key). Raffray 1890: 118, 124. Casey 1894: 477. The morphology of this genus was covered in depth by Sabella et al. (2004). The following text provides a brief characterization of the Nearctic taxa of the genus. Body: light to dark brown, setae on head and pronotum short, curved and suberect, setae over rest of body usually longer and varying from suberect to appressed, but usually decumbent, setae often modified in areas of male modifications. Head: longer than wide across eyes, or about as long as wide. Eyes large, tempora short and rounded, usually about half length of eyes. Large median and lateral vertexal foveae present and setose, median fovea may be weak or absent in Nisa, distance between foveae subequal. Eleven antennomeres, antennal clubs modified in Nisa and one species in the dentata species-group has the intermediate flagellomeres modified. Gular foveae close. Prothorax: pronotum about as wide as long, slightly wider than head across eyes; with median and lateral antebasal foveae large and setose, median fovea usually slightly smaller, foveae of Nisa smaller than in other species groups; with lateral procoxal foveae widely separated. Elytra: with two basal and two subbasal foveae, discal stria elongate, extending from lateral fovea about fourfifths elytral length. Meso- metathorax: mesoventrite with lateral mesosternal foveae large and simple, meeting internally, median mesosternal fovea short, lacking in Nisa; lateral mesocoxal foveae present; lateral metasternal foveae present. Legs: with trochanters and metatibiae modified in males of some species; metatibiae with apical brush on mesal margin. Abdomen: five visible abdominal tergites, for males tergites 1 and/or 2 typically modified, rarely simple, 3–4 modified in some species; ventrite 3 modified in one species; basal discal carinae present, but very short in some species, lacking in some members of Nisa. Visible tergites 1–4 with laterobasal foveae, tergite 1 with small one to two laterobasal foveae; with mediobasal foveae widely separated. Ventrite 1 with laterobasal foveae; ventrite 2 with mediobasal foveae widely separated, meeting internally, lateral basal foveae distinct. Ventrites often broadly rounded in males, flattened medially in a few species; six visible ventrites in both sexes. Aedeagus: aedeagal form symmetrical or nearly so, with parameres and dorsal plate, parameres with preapical large, flattened, hyaline seta; internal sac with few large spines or shorter complex multidentate spine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicColeoptera Taxonomy and DistributionFrench-language works237,207