MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6912598175 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4740573

Hogsbackia Ermilov & Hugo-Coetzee & Behan-Pelletier 2021, gen. nov.

2021· article· en· W6912598175 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmphibian and Reptile Biology
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaRostrumFemurTibiaGenus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Genus Hogsbackia gen. nov. Type species: Hogsbackia africaensis sp. nov. Diagnosis. Adult. With character states of the Punctoribatidae (Grandjean 1953; Behan-Pelletier & Eamer 2008). Size: Distinctly elongate; body size ratio (length/width) 2.0–2.2, notogaster size ratio (length/width) 1.7. Integu- ment: Without heavy sculpturing and ornamentation. Prodorsum: Rostrum with two incisions. Lamellae well separated, narrow, with short truncate apical cusp. Translamella lineate, weakly developed. Genal tooth fused to rostrum. Bothridium with large lateral and ventromedial scales. Dorsophragmata clearly removed from each other. Notogaster: Anterior margin of notogaster well developed, covering mediobasal part of bothridium. Pteromorph immovable, large, curved ventrally, without desclerotized linear region. Lenticulus absent. Posterior notogastral tectum present, complete. Octotaxic system as four pairs of porose areas. Notogastral setation 11 pairs, including setae dp. Gnathosoma. Subcapitulum diarthric, without tectum on mentum. Axillary saccule present. Palp setation 0-2-1-3-9(+ω). Solenidion bacilliform, attached to eupathidium along length. Lateral podosomal and epimeral regions: Pedotectum I as large lamina. Custodium short. Discidium triangular. Circumpedal carina present. Porose areas Ad, Am and Ah present, Al absent. Epimeral setal formula: 3-1-2-2; seta 1c similar in morphology to other epimeral setae. Anogenital region: Four pairs of genital, one pair of aggenital, two pairs of anal and three pairs of adanal setae. Postanal porose area present, rounded. Legs: All legs heterotridactylous. Tibia I with dorsodistal apophysis bearing solenidion φ 2. Lateral seta on all genua and tibiae setiform, thin. Porose area present on tarsi I-IV, femora I-IV and trochanters III, IV. Leg setation: femur 5-5-2-2; genu 3-3-0-1; tibia 4-4-2-2; tarsi 18-15-14-12. Juvenile instars. Unknown. Remarks. The new genus differs from other genera of Punctoribatidae by the combination of character states: body distinctly elongate; 11 pairs of notogastral setae (including dp); Am and Ah as porose areas; genal tooth fused to rostrum; four pairs of genital setae; complete posterior notogastral tectum; well separated dorsophragmata; leg setation: femur 5-5-2-2; genu 3-3-0-1; tibia 4-4-2-2; tarsi 18-15-14-12. See “Discussion” section below.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.092

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicAmphibian and Reptile Biology→French-language works237,207→