Stylochaeta scirtetica Brunson 1950
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stylochaeta scirtetica Brunson, 1950 (Figure 18) Localities. Artificial pond, Nybro, Småland (N 56º 44’ 56’’; E 15º 54’ 14’’). Material. 2 specimens. TL, 175 µm; CL, 5 µm; PhL, 33 µm; MD, 10 µm; SG1, 160 µm; SG2, 70–100 µm; SG3, 80–90 µm; SG4, 20 µm. Large sized species with three-lobed head and a thin cephalion. At the posterior end two short styli are present each carrying three setae/bristles, of which one is much longer than the other two. Four pairs of spine groups are present, originating ventrally or ventrolaterally. The three anterior groups consist of spines with two denticles, while the spines of the posteriormost spine group have only one denticle with a small bifurcation at their ends. From anterior to posterior each group consists of 3, 3, 2 and 1 spine/s. The first group is situated in the neck region and has the longest spines. Spines of group 2 and 3 are of approximately equal length. The single spine of the last group is much shorter than those of the anterior groups. Locomotory ciliature consists of five ventral ciliary tufts and three pairs of semi-circular ciliary tufts on the head. Pharynx short but with strong posterior swelling. Previously reported from Germany (Schwank 1990), United States (Brunson 1950; Schwank 1990) and Canada (Schwank 1990).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".